The case was provided to us and the I have to submit it. As we have already written on the concerned topic and also as per the case discussion. The solution which I got it looks like expert really knows that What I exactly want. The expert provide me the help in detailed manner. I am very happy

1000 words around 10 references attached case study to this assesment... Thank you so much I have received my assignment before deadline. I will review and hope you could help to answer some of my queries if I have any.

Uses academic and discipline conventions and sources of evidence 5% Poorly written with errors in spelling, grammar. Demonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas. There are mistakes in using the APA style. Is written according to academic genre (e.g. with introduction, conclusion or summary) and has accurate spelling, grammar, sentence and paragraph construction. Demonstrates consistent use of credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas, but these are not Is well-written and adheres to the academic genre (e.g. with introduction, conclusion or summary). Demonstrates consistent use of high quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas. There are no mistakes in using the APA style.

Effectively communicates 20% Difficult to understand for audience, no logical/clear structure, poor flow of ideas, argument lacks supporting evidence. No effort is made to keep audience engaged, audience cannot follow the line of reasoning. Little use of presentation aids, or the presentation aids and material used are irrelevant. Information, arguments and evidence are presented in a way that is not always clear and logical. Attempts are made to keep the audience engaged, but not always successful. Line of reasoning is often difficult to follow. Presentation aids are used more for effect than relevance.

Contributes to the development of processes and measures to manage changes to scope, time, cost and quality on complex global projects. Shows understanding of integrated change control. Supports personal opinion and information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials. Demonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts. Contributes to the development of processes and measures to manage changes to scope, time, cost and quality on complex global projects. Work shows insight and thorough understanding of integrated change control. Discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials. Well demonstrated capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts.

Develops processes and measures to manage changes to scope, time, cost and quality on complex global projects. 40% Fails to contribute to the development of processes and/or measures to manage changes to scope, time, cost and quality on complex global projects. Identifies processes and measures to manage changes to scope, time, cost and quality on complex global projects but resembles a recall or summary of key ideas. Conflates/confuses assertion of personal opinion with information from the research/course materials.

Distinction (75-84) High Distinction (85-100) Contributes to identifying tasks and resources required to implement the change and estimating the time needed to complete those tasks. Contributes to presenting a coherent impact analysis. Contributes to identifying options to satisfy change and assessing their impact on project outcome and success Contributes to identifying tasks and resources required to implement the change and provides a project schedule to complete those tasks. Develops a critical analysis and evaluation of the impact of change and examines associated risks involved Contributes to identifying options which are aligned with project outcome and stakeholder wishes, to satisfy change and assess impacts on project outcome and success. Contributes to formulating a process to forecast potential change to minimise it and develops a strategy to manage change and stakeholder

Assessment Attributes Fail (0-49) Pass (50-64) Credit (65-74) Identifies and analyses change and its impacts to scope, time, cost and quality on global projects 35% Fails to contribute to identifying or analysing change and its impact on the project Contributes to identifying tasks required to implement change. Demonstrates limited awareness of possible implications of making change. Minimal analysis of change impact Contributes to identifying tasks and resources required to implement the change. Clearly articulates the impact of change on projects, identifying and analysing each of the key change contributors.

Is very well-written and adheres to the academic genre. Consistently demonstrates expert use of good quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop appropriate arguments and statements. Shows evidence of reading beyond the key reading There are no mistakes in using the APA style. Expertly written and adheres to the academic genre. Demonstrates expert use of high-quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop arguments and position statements. Shows extensive evidence of reading beyond the key reading There are no mistakes in using the APA Style.

Use of academic and discipline conventions and sources of evidence 10% Poorly written with errors in spelling, grammar. Demonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas. There are mistakes in using the APA style. Is written according to academic genre (e.g. with introduction, conclusion or summary) and has accurate spelling, grammar, sentence and paragraph construction. Demonstrates consistent use of credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas, but these are not always explicit or well developed. Is well-written and adheres to the academic genre (e.g. with introduction, conclusion or summary). Demonstrates consistent use of high quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas. There are no mistakes in using the APA style.

Constructive feedback to peers 30% Fails to offer any feedback. No support or encouragement to peers. No awareness or sensitivity to diversity amongst peers. Offers feedback but rarely constructive or useful. Feedback is not always clear or specific to guide peers. Little support or encouragement to peers. Offers feedback that is sometimes constructive or useful. Feedback is provided with examples to guide peers. Some support and encouragement to peers. Offers constructive feedback regularly. Formulates the merits of alternative ideas or proposals and communicates them to peers. Always offers detailed constructive feedback that is specific and appropriate. Expertly articulates the merits of alternative ideas or proposals and communicates them effectively to peers. Demonstrates little awareness of and/or sensitivity to diversity amongst peers. Demonstrates some level of awareness of and sensitivity to diversity amongst peers. Offers support and encouragement to peers.

Distinction (75-84) High Distinction (85-100) Contributes an identification of both tools and techniques of sourcing project data and analyses or evaluates their value towards the processes to measure and manage project change. Supports personal opinion and information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials. Contributes an identification of both tools and techniques of sourcing project data and analyses or evaluates their value towards the processes to measure and manage project change, with added insight that extends knowledge available from sourced data. Critically discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials

Assessment Attributes Fail (0-49) Pass (50-64) Credit (65-74) Contributes to identifying tools or techniques of sourcing project data and developing processes and measures to manage project change 60% Fails to contribute to the identification of tools or techniques of sourcing data and/or developing processes and measures to manage project change. Contributes an identification of tools or techniques of sourcing project data. Resembles a recall or summary of key ideas. Contributes an identification of both tools and techniques of sourcing project data without citing evidence from the research or readings. Demonstrates capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts.