Why does plato believe philosophers should be rulers

Assignment Help Other Subject

Reference no: EM13520579

Why does Plato believe philosophers should be rulers?

No words limit..........

Reference no: EM13520579

Questions Cloud

Difference between subjective claims and objective claims : Explain how you would teach the difference between subjective claims and objective claims to someone who had never heard of critical thinking.

A hypothetical case : A hypothetical case and question You are a medical researcher who has discovered a means to cure mentally ill people. The people you can "cure" do not know who they are or who you are.

Is being off the grid possible in your current profession : Which specific electronic device or appliance could you not live without? Could you go “off the grid”? What might be good about going off the grid? Is being off the grid possible in your current profession?

Why bother changing a corrupt constitution : Whose advice is most practical? Why bother changing a corrupt constitution (Politeia)?

Why does plato believe philosophers should be rulers : Why does Plato believe philosophers should be rulers?

An internal contradiction in the idea of group self-interest : An internal contradiction in the idea of “group self-interest” in contrast to individual self-interest? Provide an example that helps explain your response.

Explain what elements of social contract theory : What would be the best way, from the perspective of social contract theory, to deal with the presence of large numbers of illegal immigrants in a country? explain what elements of social contract theory lead to this conclusion. do you think this i..

Explain st. anselms argument for the existence of god : Be able to name and explain St. Anselm’s argument for the existence of God. Be able to list the two premises and conclusion to the Kalam Cosmological Argument. Know two of the arguments Craig uses to show that the Universe is finite.

What do theoretical innovations and anomalous novelties : Explain the difference(s) between Herschel and Whewell’s accounts of verae causae. Is an anomaly, according to Kuhn, sufficient to cause a crisis in normal science? What do theoretical innovations and anomalous novelties of fact have in common, accor..

User Account

All Pages