Why did the introduction of team-based working fail

Assignment Help Business Management
Reference no: EM133019926

CASE STUDY ON INITECH

INTECH is a leading medium-sized cosmetic device company based in southwest England. The company had a standard functional structure for most of its 20-year history, with each area (manufacturing, engineering, finance, sales, marketing, and so on) reporting directly to the CEO, Daniel Fisher, and the two senior executives Vera Martin and Robin Blake. For several years, the company had been growing steadily, but with rapid advances in information technology, Daniel was becoming increasingly concerned about the company's long-term viability and competitiveness.

Over the following five years, his principal business goals were to make INITECH a more agile, responsive, and inventive organisation with faster decision-making and implementation. This was reflected in the company's mission statement. Daniel also intended to make INITECH a more exciting and empowering workplace to boost organisational commitment and happiness among employees, given the higher-than-average staff turnover in previous years. As a result, Daniel expected the company's growth to accelerate.

With these goals in mind, Daniel sent Vera and Robin to a management seminar 18 months ago that focused on the concept and practice of teamwork. Vera returned to persuade Daniel that changing the organisation's structure from its current functional orientation to one based on a network of product line teams would be the most excellent plan for INITECH's future success. The new team-based design, according to Vera, will form seven multi-functional teams, one for each of the company's primary product lines. Each product line team would have a representation from each of the existing functional groups. She also talked about how product line teams may define their own goals, control their work processes, create and develop new goods, and be fully responsible for their product line's profit. While Robin had some misgivings about these ideas at first, Daniel was enthusiastic about them, knowing that Vera was convinced that a structural shift would be the most significant step for the company. Vera worked closely with Daniel over the next two weeks to turn the thoughts into concrete designs. The plans were approved in March 2009, and staff were notified of the new strategy.

Vera had been very open, flexible, and upfront in discussions with Daniel and the staff about how this could work for them from the outset. She had deep passionate confidence in the possibilities of team-based working for the business. However, as the adjustment was gradually implemented over the next few months, Robin highlighted several concerns he had not previously mentioned. Robin grew sceptical, fearing that the new team-based structure would erode managers' authority over staff, owing to his risk-averse and detail-oriented personality. Robin cherished the authority that came with his position in the company and did not want it jeopardised in any way. As a result, during one of their weekly after-work golf games (which Vera had no interest in and hence never attended), Robin began to try to sway Daniel by expressing concern about the organisational changes and asking him to reconsider the team-based design. Robin had a fantastic resume and was a well-known expert in the field of electronics production. He wielded some power and influence on Daniel, who depended mainly on Robin's knowledge and experience. Indeed, Daniel was concerned by Robin's remarks. It was too late to go back now, and restoring to the old structure would have been prohibitively expensive. As a result, despite Robin's apparent scepticism, the plans went ahead.

Despite high hopes for what product line teams could accomplish, sales and profit plateaued and then began to decline after the first six months of deployment. All attempts to reverse the trend had failed, including putting pressure on the teams to improve and threatening team members with being replaced by others. Robin was privately chuffed with himself because he had warned Daniel about similar issues for months. On the other hand, Vera stayed upbeat and encouraged employees to make open ideas, which helped improve things.

Employees believed what they were taught when the team-based structure was initially adopted, and they ran the teams with a strong sense of ownership and excitement. They soon discovered, however, that they did not have the autonomy they had been promised. Robin retained ultimate budget responsibility, allocated all resources across the company, and insisted on approving all new product-line ideas proposed by the teams based on his knowledge. He frequently neglected to keep Vera informed about choices, resulting in teams receiving contradictory messages from management. This caused dissatisfaction and tension among the teams, with some members prepared to submit to Robin's authority while others were vehement about questioning his contradicting behaviour.

One of the audio device teams, for example, had spent weeks meticulously developing a new product design, producing prototypes, performing market research, and researching new production materials for the product. This needed coordination and resulted in many heated debates among team members over how the product should work. Despite the tensions, the team was delighted with its final plan and was looking forward to pitching it to the rest of the company and reaping its labour benefits. Vera was also quite cheerful about their work and frequently complimented Daniel on his efforts. Indeed, Vera had given the team the authority to build the new product in the first place, and she had supported them throughout the process.

On the other hand, Robin hammered the team with difficult questions and found holes in their proposal when they presented it to management, meticulously describing all the severe aspects they had overlooked. Daniel could agree with Robin's decision because Robin was an expert in the field. Vera also found it difficult to question Robin's authority, and in the end, the plan was decided to be rejected. The team members were devastated after all of their hard work and Vera's support. Not only were business decisions taking longer than they had in the past, but it turned out that the team had no control over new product design.

Despite the considerable acceptance of the concept of team-based design at the start of the implementation, there was often a mismatch between words and actions. Vera, for example, frequently stressed the need to implement 'team time,' in which each team could hold a monthly meeting to reflect on their performance and come up with new project ideas based on employee feedback. Although Daniel was initially supportive of the proposal, it became evident that scheduling time for such team meetings was impeding Robin's productivity. Instead, Robin requested that each product line team provide a formal monthly presentation to the senior executives, including their previous month's results and their budget and goals for the months ahead. Rather than seeing this as a way to help the teams, many regarded it as an opportunity for management to figure out what went wrong, keep track of their plans, and threaten them if they didn't better their performance in the next month. This seemed in contrast with the company's vision, which emphasised empowerment and creativity.

To make things work, numerous teams lately complained that certain team members weren't carrying their weight and weren't putting enough effort into team decisions, relying on others to do the work and showing little interest in their team's success. Morale was at an all-time low, and some staff had already opted to go. Daniel was at a loss for what to do next.

Analyse the INITECH case study using the theory and evidence of People and World Organizations by addressing each of the three issues:

1.1 Is the deployment of team-based working an appropriate method for supporting INITECH's intended organisational development?

1.2 Why did the introduction of team-based working fail to meet expectations?

1.3 How would you advise INITECH to deal with their current problems?

Reference no: EM133019926

Questions Cloud

Requirement of the inventory management system : Research practices for inventory management systems for small businesses and analyse the requirements of the inventory management system
Determine Mr Locke charitable donations tax credit : In 2021, his income remains at 93,808 and he makes no further donations. Determine Mr. Locke's charitable donations tax credit for 2020
Student governance association : What are two other clubs/student organizations housed in Student Governance Association (SGA)
How much of the company is financed by debt : Question - A proprietorship has assets of $200,000 and liabilities of $140,000. How much of the company is financed by debt
Why did the introduction of team-based working fail : One of the audio device teams, for example, had spent weeks meticulously developing a new product design, producing prototypes, performing market research, and
Determine the equivalent units of production for materials : Units started into production during the month 23,000. Determine the equivalent units of production for materials and conversion costs
How you might use business analytics in personal life : Discuss how you might use business analytics in your personal life, such as in managing your grocer purchasing, automobile maintenance, budgeting or sports.
What is the net present value : Case Study C is a three year project which has an initial cost of $6,000,000 with depreciation of $2,000,000 p.a. What is the Net Present Value
What type of organisational structure : What type of organisational structure does new balance(popular shoe brand) follow and explain it briefly.

Reviews

Write a Review

Business Management Questions & Answers

  Caselet on michael porter’s value chain management

The assignment in management is a two part assignment dealing 1.Theory of function of management. 2. Operations and Controlling.

  Mountain man brewing company

Mountain Man Brewing, a family owned business where Chris Prangel, the son of the president joins. Due to increase in the preference for light beer drinkers, Chris Prangel wants to introduce light beer version in Mountain Man. An analysis into the la..

  Mountain man brewing company

Mountain Man Brewing, a family owned business where Chris Prangel, the son of the president joins. An analysis into the launch of Mountain Man Light over the present Mountain Man Lager.

  Analysis of the case using the doing ethics technique

Analysis of the case using the Doing Ethics Technique (DET). Analysis of the ethical issue(s) from the perspective of an ICT professional, using the ACS Code of  Conduct and properly relating clauses from the ACS Code of Conduct to the ethical issue.

  Affiliations and partnerships

Affiliations and partnerships are frequently used to reach a larger local audience? Which options stand to avail for the Hotel manager and what problems do these pose.

  Innovation-friendly regulations

What influence (if any) can organizations exercise to encourage ‘innovation-friendly' regulations?

  Effect of regional and corporate cultural issues

Present your findings as a group powerpoint with an audio file. In addition individually write up your own conclusions as to the effects of regional cultural issues on the corporate organisational culture of this multinational company as it conducts ..

  Structure of business plan

This assignment shows a structure of business plan. The task is to write a business plane about a Diet Shop.

  Identify the purposes of different types of organisations

Identify the purposes of different types of organisations.

  Entrepreneur case study for analysis

Entrepreneur Case Study for Analysis. Analyze Robin Wolaner's suitability to be an entrepreneur

  Forecasting and business analysis

This problem requires you to apply your cross-sectional analysis skills to a real cross-sectional data set with the goal of answering a specific research question.

  Educational instructional leadership

Prepare a major handout on the key principles of instructional leadership

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd