Reference no: EM133748288
During the trial process Why did Harold's attorney not object to an all women jury during the Vire Dire Process? Did an all women jury solidify Harold's conviction? What does Harold's attorney need to do to get a new trial since the prosecutor withheld information showing that there was another possible suspect? The new information was not disclosed until after the trial. How do I proceed?
Step one: How do I define the What question needs to be asked?
Step two: What is my evidence
Step three What is my coral conscience
Step 4 and five: What is my decision making model?
Scenario Harold, a Hispanic man, was tried and convicted of rape, a felony. His jury consisted of six members, and all of them were women. During the jury selection, the prosecutor used all of his peremptory challenges to eliminate men, and Harold's attorney did not object.
In addition, the prosecutor had evidence which pointed to another suspect, and this evidence was not disclosed until after the trial was over. Harold's new attorney wants to appeal his conviction. His jury was sux members - all women.
|
What is the role of intelligence in fostering
: What is the role of intelligence in fostering and maintaining a contextual understanding of the threats inherent within the terrorism environment?
|
|
What is effect of illicit trafficking networks on a source
: What is the effect of illicit trafficking networks on a source, transit, or user state? Examine results, and provide examples.
|
|
Which officer personality would you display
: Which officer personality would you display and why? (The dictator, the friend, the merchant, the turnkey, the do-gooder, the climber, the reformer)
|
|
How would it be visible in terms of policing methods
: How would it be visible in terms of policing methods and tactics? Explain.
|
|
Why did harolds attorney not object to an all women jury
: Why did Harold's attorney not object to an all women jury during the Vire Dire Process? Did an all women jury solidify Harold's conviction?
|
|
Explain the four layers of the criminal justice wedding cake
: Explain your own words the four layers of the criminal justice wedding cake.
|
|
Examine the ethical rationales for punishment
: Examines the ethical rationales for punishment. Today, our punishments primarily consist of imprisonment or some form of restricted liberty.
|
|
Discuss the early classifications of sexual offenders
: Discuss the early classifications of sexual offenders. How did early theorists categorize and understand sexual offenders?
|
|
Discuss about the structure and function of federal courts
: Considering what we learned in this chapter, look up any recent Supreme Court case and write briefly here about how you view its impact.
|