Thank you so much. It was a great experience by taking service of Expertsmind. Extraordinary service met every requirement. I will refer this service additionally utilise it once more. Was given solution precisely at the time guaranteed and work was at a standard level of desire at the cost paid!

Please use the diagram for explanation and do not copy paste anything I don't want to get similarity more than 10 % and also please make sure that there should not be any grammatical mistakes and I need you to use some live car examples for explanation.

The answer provides an example or examples which support the interpretation of the theory in relation to a firm's benefits and costs in the context of the market structure in which the firm operates to support the analyse of the question and/or the decisions based on this analysis. The narrative makes the link between the example(s) and theory and their application to policy with only minor lapses in logic. The answer provides an example or examples which exhibit the most important elements of theory in relation to a firm's benefits and costs in the context of the market structure in which the firm operates to support the analysis of the question and/or the decisions based on this analysis. However the narrative does not make a convincing link between the example(s) and theory and subsequent application to policy. Fails to meet criteria for a pass.

Provision of examples to support, illustrate or elaborate the application of the theory of the firm, the benefits they seek, the costs they incur and the market structure in which they are found in a policy context (20% weighting). The answer provides an example or examples which support the synthesis of the theory in relation to a firm's benefits and costs in the context of the market structure in which the firm operates with new insights to support the analyse of the question and/or the decisions based on this analysis. The narrative makes a strong link between the example(s), existing theory and new insights and the application of each to policy. The answer provides an example or examples which support the evaluation of the theory in relation to a firm's benefits and costs in the context of the market structure in which the firm operates to support the analyse of the question and/or the decisions based on this analysis. The narrative makes a strong link between the example(s) and theory and their application to policy.

Analyses benefits and cost components to provide market related recommendations in the context of the market structure of the industry in a manner which indicates the importance of understanding the structure of the market in which the firm operates (60% weighting). The answer synthesises the theory in relation to a firm's benefits and costs in the context of the market structure in which the firm operates with new insights providing an in-depth application of the theory of the firm along with clearly labelled relevant diagrams to produce a comprehensive analysis that is used as the basis for identifying the correct decisions within the context of specific market circumstances. The answer evaluates the theory in relation to a firm's benefits and costs in the context of the market structure in which the firm operates to analyse the question. Decisions based on analysis correctly reflect the options available given specified market conditions and are presented through a sound argument showing good judgement. However, minor errors have been found in the narrative or use of diagrams.

Academic writing includes APA 6th referencing (10% weighting). Referencing is comprehensive, demonstrates academic integrity, and conforms exactly to APA style conventions. Referencing is comprehensive, demonstrates academic integrity, and conforms to APA style conventions with fewer than three minor errors or omissions which don't impact on the transparency and traceability of the source or the demonstration of academic integrity. Referencing is comprehensive and mostly accurate according to APA style conventions. Up to eight minor errors or omissions in style and formatting choices (e.g. italics, punctuation, underlining) don't impact on the transparency and traceability of the source, or the demonstration of academic integrity. Referencing is comprehensive and mostly accurate according to APA style conventions. Frequent minor errors or omissions in style and formatting choices (e.g. italics, punctuation, underlining) don't impact on the transparency and traceability of the source, or the demonstration of academic integrity. Fails to meet criteria for a pass.

Criteria HD (85%) DI (75-84%) CR (65-74%) PS (50-64%) FL (0<50%) Academic writing clearly communicates meaning (10% weighting). Language features and structures are used to convey meaning effectively, clearly, concisely, unambiguously, and in a tone appropriate to the audience and purpose with no spelling, grammatical, or punctuation errors. Language features and structures are used to convey meaning effectively, clearly, unambiguously, and in a tone appropriate to the audience and purpose with few spelling, grammatical, or punctuation errors. The text contains some errors in spelling, grammar, word choice, and structure, lacks clarity occasionally, and may not be concise, but the meaning is apparent to the reader with little effort. The text contains frequent errors in spelling, grammar, word choice, and structure, lacks clarity, and is not concise, but the meaning is apparent to the reader with some effort. Fails to meet criteria for a pass.

you have to use diagrams to explain the answer and please check out the presentation level I gave you in assignment please divided answer in three parts 1. introduction 2. analysis 3. conclusion and do not copy paste any thing I don''t want similarity level up to 10 % and grammatically mistake also