Reference no: EM133516648

Question

1. The Mods ad Rockers'moral panic was primarily driven by overstated media, analyzing the progression of their conflicts which portrayed both parties as wrongdoers and troublemakers. Public perception and terror aggravated the moral panic. The hyperbolic media coverage and the government's response impacted public opinion, resulting in a pervasive sense of discomfort and terror toward both cultures.

2. Regarding whether media audiences today are as readily influenced to accept what they see and read, it's crucial to remember that the media environment has changed dramatically. With the emergence of social platforms and digital media, there is now a plethora of sources and methods via which knowledge may be delivered. This media variety has both good and bad consequences for the persuasiveness of media material. Moral panics can also be defined as outbreaks of public fear or anxiety that occur when a specific group or behavior is seen to pose a danger to social values and standards. The influence of media on audience beliefs and behaviours is broad and complicated. While media viewers now have greater access to a wider range of information, critical thinking skills and media literacy are essential for navigating the large media environment and avoiding the potential effect of persuasive content.

3. The potential real-world consequences, are that Facebook and Twitter providers have a responsibility to combat the spread of false information. Social media underlines the potential for disinformation to incite violence, impair public health, and undermine democratic processes. Platforms, proponents argue, should aggressively monitor and take action against accounts or content that purposefully spread lies, reducing the harm caused by misinformation.

Social media firms should prioritize free speech protection and enable people to freely discuss views, even if they are inaccurate. Individuals, they feel, have the right to express themselves, and it is up to the audience to critically analyze the information offered. They argue that permitting platforms to monitor or restrict information may result in biased enforcement and a reduction in the diversity of opinions.