Which might have questionable validity

Reference no: EM133659428

Homework: Case Study Analysis

Instructions

Students will be required to prepare two pieces of written work during the course. Each piece involves a thorough written analysis of a case study.

Case Study: Incept LLC and Confluent Surgical (A)

Answer the following questions:

1. As part of the legal team recently recruited at Confluent Surgical, you were tasked to review the license agreement and analyze the company's business strategy including its IP and regulatory strategy, product offering, value proposition, financials, and market attractiveness. Based on your analysis, which should include a summary of the factors and concerns about this investment deal, make a recommendation on the best path forward. You must support your recommendation with sound evidence based on your analysis.

2. For this homework, start by presenting your recommendation up front for quick evaluation followed by in-depth analysis.

General Guidelines:

1. Exhibits do not count towards the length limit but cannot be primarily text and should contain specific types of analyses (competitiveness, cost and benefit, risk assessment, financials, gaps, etc.) and information that backs up the recommendation and is relevant. It cannot be an extension of the text.

2. This written homework should reflect the student's own ideas, analysis, and answers. Whenever the student is adding information where others have contributed, or non-original ideas have been included, the student must give proper recognition and reference. Please take the time to review the Academic Integrity Policy, which is published on Sheridan's Academic Integrity Office website.

3. Avoid rehashing of case data. Case facts should only be used to support a specific line of reasoning. Assume the reader is familiar with the case.

4. Remember not to build your recommendation solely based on case data, which might have questionable validity.

5. When applicable, be sure to include a brief discussion of alternatives or strategies you did not choose and your reasoning for their dismissal.

Reference no: EM133659428

Questions Cloud

What are similarities or differences between jail and prison : What are similarities, or differences, between jail and prison. Is there a difference or can we use the word jail generically to mean any and all incarceration

Why do you want to provide those services rather than others : What programs and services do you want to be offering your demographic group? Why do you want to provide those services rather than others?

What was most powerful idea of first half of 19th century : What was the most powerful idea of the first half of the 19th century (1800 to 1850)?

Parallel rights did not exist : What if parallel rights did not exist? How would rights such as one against self-incrimination, search and seizure,

Which might have questionable validity : Remember not to build your recommendation solely based on case data, which might have questionable validity.

Determining jurisdiction-the bennett case : If the action is based on New York state law, does the New York trial court have both subject and personal jurisdiction over the defendant?

Describe negligence gross negligence or an intentional act : Describe each of the following concepts using your hospitality related example: Negligence, gross negligence, or an intentional act that result in commission.

Child protection system : What steps to follow according to the child protection system, including the roles and responsibilities of key agencies when reporting?

What might be considered the public realm of business : To what extent did Lucas spend her time and do her work in the home versus what might be considered the public realm of business?

User Account

All Pages