Reference no: EM133642220

Discussion Post

Question I: A medical group recently conducted an advertising campaign for its new pediatric orthopedics department. After four weeks, a telephone survey found that 42% of the families with children under age 18 were aware of the service. Six months later, it found that 12% had actually used the service, and 3% said they were regular users of the facility for their children's orthopedic needs. Compare this organization's advertising performance to that of the hospital discussed in Table 15.7. How does this organization compare in terms of its media, creative, and service-effectiveness ratios? Where might the medical group need to make adjustments? Provide detailed explanation.

Question II: In an era of transparency, some healthcare organizations are beginning to counter such third-party transparency sites as Angie's List by posting patients' ratings of their medical staff with a star-based approach along with ratings. At a recent medical staff meeting of the hospital where you are the marketing director, a department chair in surgery spoke rather vociferously against this new approach. "We seem to be moving to commoditizing what we do as physicians. I bought a car last weekend. The approach we are now taking is no different. I look at the ratings, and patients are looking at our medical staff? What is next? Will you have us interview with patients so they can decide who they want to meet with? These people are coming to us because of the expertise and skill we have. If they want to buy a product, let them go to the shopping mall." When the physician sat down, several others nodded in agreement and a few others clapped in support. The CEO thanked the doctor for the opinion and suggested that rather than turn from this week's agenda, it should be the focus of the next bimonthly meeting in terms of discussing the posting of patient evaluations along with directly addressing the broader issue raised by the chair of surgery.