Reference no: EM132507718
Point 1: Wilton International is large conglomerate with divisions that produce chemicals, tires, specialty metals and pharmaceuticals. Two years ago , the CFO noted that the company paid consultants more than $ 3 million per year to help solve problems related to manufacturing efficiency, employee motivation, investment decisions and a variety of other matters. The $ 3 million in charges reflect average fees of approximately $ 120 per hour. The CFO decided that substantial funds could be saved by setting up an internal consulting group. Accordingly, 5 senior consultants from a respected firm were hired to run an internal consulting group at an average salary of $150,000 per year. These new managers hired 15 additional employees at an average salary of $ 50,000 per year. Thus, the company had 20 full time internal consultants at a yearly cost of only $ 1,500,000. The 20 individuals can work approximately 38,000 hours per year in total.
Point 2: In the first year of the consulting group, the CFO sent out a notice to all divisions that they would no longer be allowed to hire outside consultants for work that could be performed by the internal group. Further, each division was to be charged a flat annual fee for use of the consultants based on their relative size (measured in sales dollars) over the last four years. With is approach the allocation was as follows:
Chemicals $ 150,000
Tires $ 300,000
Specialty Metals $ 450,000
Pharmaceuticals $ 600,000
Point 3: With this allocation, the division managers made frequent demands for the services of the consultants. Indeed, because of the demand for the services of the internal consultants, there were frequent delays, often exceeding one month.
Point 4: The following year, the CFO changed the method of allocation to a charge for hours worked. Since costs were $ 1,500,000 and 38,000 hours were available, the charge was $ 39.50 per hour. With this charge, demand for consulting services declined drastically. In fact, the average consultant was only charging 70% of available hours. Further, all requests for services were easily answered within a day or two.
Required:
Question a. Explain the difference in demand under the two allocation schemes.
Question b. Since the demand is declining the CFO is considering closing the internal consultancy department. Based on the information provided what would you advise?
Research suggests that being good public speaker
: Research suggests that being a good public speaker can help individuals grow their business, advance their career, and form strong collaborations
|
Calculate implied-theoretical cross rate
: Citibank quotes U.S. dollar per pound: $1.5000/£ National Westminster quotes euros per pound: €2.0000/£ Deutschebank quotes U.S. dollar per euro: $0.7550/€
|
Does the market lead to equilibrium or instability
: Does the market lead to equilibrium or instability? What are their views on inflation and deflation, how do they relate to aggregate supply-aggregate demand
|
What is the terminal value
: We are currently at the end of year "t". You performed a thorough financial analysis of XYZ and forecast the following Free Cash Flows (FCF):
|
What would advise for wilton international
: Demand is declining the CFO is considering closing the internal consultancy department. Based on the information provided what would you advise
|
Calculate firm new debt ratio
: Two textile companies, McDaniel-Edwards Manufacturing and Jordan-Hocking Mills, began operations with identical balance sheets. A year later both required
|
How might we reconcile drastically different understandings
: Like many of the impairments we've addressed this quarter, Autism is described as being on a spectrum. What do you think might be the positive and negative.
|
CSM80002 Environmental Sustainability in Construction
: CSM80002 Environmental Sustainability in Construction Assignment Help and Solution - Swinburne University of Technology, Australia - Assessment Writing Service
|
What is its required rate of return on equity
: Consider the following for a firm. Its stock price (P0) is at $50, its payout ratio (POR) is 0.4, its EPS1 is $2.00, and investor required return is 10%.
|