What were the strengths and limitations of the methods used

Reference no: EM132306509 , Length: word count:1200

Evidence for Practice Assignment - Critical Appraisal of Evidence

For Assessment students are required to demonstrate their ability to reflect on a health scenario and critically appraise the evidence (primary research paper) provided in relation to a health scenario. The scenario is available under the Assessment tile. Students are required to identify strengths and limitations of a research paper at a beginning level. The research paper can be located under the Assessment tile. Finally, students are required to discuss the factors which influence the use of evidence in practice. The critical appraisal of evidence must be supported by a minimum of four (4) references which are valid and varied academic sources (e.g. Greenhalgh et al. 2018; Hoffman et al. 2017).

Instructions: Critically appraise the research paper provided in LEO located under the Assessment tile, and read the corresponding health scenario. The research paper should be accessed as a full text and critically appraised using the questions identified in Part A & B, which are based on Greenhalgh et al. (2018). The research paper being critically appraised should be written as a full reference at the beginning of the essay (and included in the reference list). The paper should be referenced in-text according to APA (i.e. author, year) required for direct quotes only.

Writing in an essay format (introduction, body, conclusion, reference list) answer the questions in Part A and Part B. Students should refer to the ACU Study Guide: Skills for Success (2017) - available online - to ensure they follow the university's essay writing and referencing guidelines.

Small/short headings may be used. Do not repeat the questions or scenario.

Part A -

Consider the strengths and limitations (critically appraise) the research paper using the following questions. Each paragraph should be supported with a high quality, valid, varied academic reference. This reference is supporting your knowledge and understanding of critical appraisal related to the research paper.

Authorship

1. Discuss the strengths and limitations of the:

a. Authors' expertise, based on their cited qualifications and affiliations;

b. Possible conflicts of interest or possible grounds for bias in the paper.

Research Questions, aim or hypothesis

2. Outline the research study's question/s, aim or hypothesis and present the author's justification/s as to why their study was needed.

Research Design

3. Discuss the research design and how the authors justified their choice of design for their stated research question.

Research Methods

4. Discuss the methods the researchers used for: selecting study participants and for collecting and analysing data?

What were the strengths and limitations of the methods used?

Results and limitation of the study

5. Discuss whether the results/conclusions of the study answer the research study's question/s.

Describe how the limitations impact the application of the study findings?

Part B -

Application of research evidence into clinical practice considering the given scenario and clinical question.

Adoption of research findings is often restricted due to a range of key enablers and barriers. Reflecting on your scenario describe some of the enablers and barriers to the uptake of your papers research findings.

Purpose: The written assignment is required to provide the students with an opportunity to demonstrate fundamental skills required for sound appraisal of research. These assessments are designed to engage students with content that will build knowledge which, by the conclusion of this programme, will allow the student to graduate as a health care professional who can locate and critically appraise discipline specific literature.

Reference Article - Day, N., Criss J., Griffiths, B., Gujral, S.K., John-Leader, F., Johnson, J., & Pit, S. (2018). Music festival attendees' illicit drug use, knowledge and practices regarding drug content and purity: A cross-sectional survey. Harm Reduction Journal, 15(1), 1-8. doi : 10.1186/s12954-017-0205-7.

Attachment:- Assignment Files.rar

Reference no: EM132306509

Questions Cloud

Problem solving more effectively address unique situations : How can the use of creativity in problem solving more effectively address unique situations?

What are the social changes in life-span development : You will select four (4) of the following terms or concepts. You will read and research at least three scholarly sources and then identify, discuss and place.

Discuss three basic functions performed by intermediaries : What is meant by a marketing channel? Discuss the three basic functions performed by intermediaries.

Common philosophies and complementary talents : A true partnership between two individuals with common philosophies and complementary talents.

What were the strengths and limitations of the methods used : HLSC122 Evidence for Practice Assignment - Critical Appraisal of Evidence, Australian Catholic University, Australia. What were the strengths and limitations

Majoring in marketing benefit from taking marketing class : How can students who are not majoring in marketing benefit from taking a marketing class? How can a marketing knowledge help staff managers, financial managers,

Create a publicly visible facial and bodily display : Emotional labor refers to a form of emotion regulation that creates a publicly visible facial and bodily display within the workplace.

Advantages and disadvantages of using google classrooms : What are the advantages and disadvantages of using Google classrooms for school grades (Kinder to 12th grade)? Would Google classrooms

Create a whole picture of the current communication systems : CIS8009 Management of Business Telecommunications - University of Southern Queensland - how the organisations services are delivered and how the different

Reviews

len2306509

5/15/2019 10:19:40 PM

Word Count: 1200 words. This assignment have part A and part B. 1200 WORDS including both. APA references. Academic database search. Need 4 reference and 2 references already from the article. Assessment criteria: Critical appraisal, knowledge, critical thinking, presentation. Please include the word count of your assignment on the front page of your assignment or in a header. Please note that in-text citations are included in the word count whilst the reference list is not included in the word count. Words that are more than 10% over the word count will not be considered.

5/15/2019 10:19:34 PM

Length and/or format: Assessment 3 (Part a & b) should not exceed 1200 words +/-10% (including in-text citations) WORD COUNT - Writing requires skill and being able to write within a specified word limit is an essential component of professional and academic work. Reading and writing critically are fundamental skills which demonstrate an understanding and an ability to make judgements and solve problems, hence why only 10% of a word count should be direct quotes. That is, if the word count is 1500 words only 150 of those words should be direct quotes. Word counts provide students with an indication of the amount of detail and work required for each assessment item.

5/15/2019 10:19:28 PM

What is included in a word count? - Essentially, all text within an assessment item from the introduction through to the conclusion is counted in the word count. This includes all in-text citations, direct quotes and headings. The word count does not include the following: Title page, Reference list, Appendices, Tables and Figures and legends. REFERENCING - This unit requires you to use the APA referencing system.

Write a Review

Required(*) Message

User Account

All Pages