Presentation skills (25% of total mark) ? Presentation is of excellent quality. Information structure and sequence is logical and easy to follow. Information is organised in a clear, coherent, and integrated manner (both within and across speakers). All group members speak, and all use clear and appropriate language. (21-25 marks) ? Presentation is of very good quality. Information structure and sequence is logical and easy to follow. Information is organised in a clear, coherent, and integrated manner (both within and across speakers). All group members speak, and all use clear and appropriate language. (17-20 marks) ? Presentation is of good quality. Information is mostly structured and sequenced in a logical and easy to follow manner (both within and between speakers). All group members speak, and most use clear and appropriate language.

Use of evidence (25% of total mark) ? Presentation is supported by accurate interpretation of appropriate evidence. Uses evidence in clear, accurate and appropriate way, demonstrating critical or thoughtful selection of evidence. Evidence is from high quality sources. (21-25 marks) ? Presentation is supported by accurate interpretation of appropriate evidence. Uses information in mostly clear, accurate and appropriate way. Evidence is mostly from high quality sources. (17-20 marks) ? Presentation is mostly supported by accurate interpretation of appropriate evidence. Uses information in mostly clear, accurate and appropriate way. Evidence is of mostly good quality throughout, or some sections very good quality and others more superficial or lower quality. (15-16 marks) ? Presentation is somewhat supported by accurate interpretation of appropriate evidence. Interpretation of evidence is generally accurate. Some good quality evidence but tendency to use superficial or lower quality evidence. (13-14 marks)

Leadership analysis (25% of total mark) ? Group presentation provides an insightful analysis of the effectiveness of the leadership actions. Excellent recommendations that are have excellent logic and reasoning. No or very minimal errors in reasoning or logic. (21-25 marks) ? Group presentation provides a very good analysis of the effectiveness of the leadership actions. Very good recommendations that have very good logic and reasoning. Minimal errors in reasoning or logic. (17-20 marks) ? Group presentation provides a good analysis of the effectiveness of the leadership actions. Good recommendations that have good logic and reasoning. May have some mostly minor errors in logic or reasoning. (15-16 marks) ? Group presentation provides an adequate analysis of the effectiveness of the leadership actions. Adequate recommendations, but logic and/or reasoning could be improved. May have some mostly minor some errors in reasoning and logic. (13-14 marks)

MGT5PLS: Assessment 3 Analysis of a leadership challenge (Group project) CRITERIA Excellent (> 80 %) Very good (70 – 79%) Good (60 – 69%) Acceptable (50 – 59%) Unacceptable (<50%) Presentation addresses the questions provided (25% of total mark) ? Questions are addressed with good understanding and conceptual development. Demonstrates critical thinking and/or thoughtful evaluation. No misunderstandings or omissions. Sharp focus on relevant details. (21-25 marks) ? Questions are addressed with good understanding and conceptual development. No major misunderstandings or omissions. Very good focus on relevant details. (17-20 marks) ? Questions are broadly addressed. May be some minor omissions or places for minor clarification. Mostly accurate understanding of questions. (15-16 marks) ? Questions broadly addressed but some parts superficially treated or moderate misunderstanding. (13-14 marks) ? Substantial portions of questions not addressed. Misunderstands questions. (<13 marks)

4. More instructions for this assignment As a group, prepare your PowerPoint slides, and set the slideshow timer to 20 seconds for each slide (see Transitions>Timing in the PowerPoint menu) No. of slides required 60-65 Word count should be around 4000 words Need a written script for all the material in ppt. Atleast 15 references required APA 6 referencing style from academic journals or books.