What was the supreme courts reason for denying

Assignment Help Business Law and Ethics

Reference no: EM133193409

Question 1. What is a motion?

Question 2. Using the textbook, name two types of motions that might be filed in a jury trial litigation and describe what each motion would do, who would file it, and when during the process would it be filed.

Question 3. What is a class action suit? What is required before a court will allow a class action suit? What would a plaintiff have to show the Court before it can be certified as a class action law suit?

Question 4. Research and find one example of a class action suit and provide a one paragraph description of the class action.

Question 5. Research and locate an example of a mandatory arbitration clause. You can usually find these in collective bargaining agreements (union contracts) and in business contracts. Provide a citation of where you found the clause and copy/paste the actual clause into this assignment. Do not just describe the clause or provide definitions of the clause. Please copy and past the clause into the assignment.

Below is an article from the NY Times dated June 20, 2011. This is about a lawsuit against Walmart and which ended up in the U. S. Supreme Court.

Please read the article. In your initial post please address these questions:

Question 1. Who were the parties to the litigation?

Question 2. What type of special lawsuit were the plaintiffs trying to bring against Walmart?

Question 3. What was the lawsuit about and why was it brought as one of a special category of lawsuits?

Question 4. Why did the plaintiffs claim that they should be allowed to proceed with this lawsuit?

Question 5. What was the Supreme Courts' reason for denying the plaintiffs the right to proceed? What does that mean to the plaintiffs and how they can or should proceed now?

As you respond to other students consider the case itself. Did the plaintiffs have a good cause of action? Should they be allowed to continue with the suits as individuals? If so, why? If not, why not?

Would this have been a good case to submit to arbitration or mediation? Why did the plaintiffs chose a court proceeding instead of mediation or arbitration?

Reference no: EM133193409

Questions Cloud

What is the role of sea otters in regulating the marine : California University of Pennsylvania - What is the role of sea otters in regulating the marine kelp ecosystem of the Pacific Ocean?

Create your initial post responding to discussion question : Create your initial post responding to the discussion question above. After you post, you will be able to see your classmates' posts

How do health issues differ between the two populations : Choose two emerging populations, such as Latino/Hispanic Americans, Asian Americans/Pacific Islanders, How do health issues differ between the two populations

Develop methods to control common construction hazards : Develop methods to control common construction hazards. Interpret Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) standards related to construction.

What was the supreme courts reason for denying : Manchester Community College - What was the Supreme Courts' reason for denying the plaintiffs the right to proceed? What does that mean to the plaintiffs

How acute hospital provide appropriate learning opportunity : Describe how an acute hospital provides appropriate learning opportunities for the application of knowledge (theory, methodology, research)

Characteristics of self-managed teams : University of the Cumberlands-What are the three steps in designing process layouts? What are the characteristics of self-managed teams?

Explain the arguments surrounding it highlight : describe the issue, explain the arguments surrounding it highlight the relevant ethical questions include suggested solutions.

Criminal actions and events of its employees and agents : Florida International University - Commingling of personal interest and business operations as demonstrated in the case of William Sharp

User Account

All Pages