What was the substance of your colleagues argument

Reference no: EM131326705

Prior to beginning work on this discussion, read the required chapters from the text and review the required articles.

The risk-benefit calculation for any drug assumes a correct diagnosis of the disorder. Many investigators and clinicians feel the current epidemic of child psychiatric disorders is largely due to inappropriate diagnosis. Evaluate the risk and benefits of using psychoactive drugs in children correctly diagnosed with a disorder versus those incorrectly diagnosed with a disorder. Consider the risks and benefits of not treating (drug treatment) a child because he or she is not correctly diagnosed with a disorder.

In your evaluation summarize the natural course of the disorder, the drug action on the neurotransmitter systems in question, and the likelihood of short-term, long-term, and permanent positive and negative effects of drug treatment. Make sure to take into account the ethical dimension of this risk-benefit calculation.

You are encouraged to post your required replies earlier in the week to promote more meaningful interactive discourse in this discussion.

What was the substance of your colleague's argument?

Do you agree with this argument? Why, or why not?

To what extent did your colleague consider the ethical dimension to this risk-benefit calculation when prescribing drugs for children who are too young to be of the age of legal consent?

Whether you agree or disagree with the conclusion, was the ethical aspect dealt with in a responsible manner? What insights did your colleague include that you had not considered?

What might you suggest he or she consider which was not already included? Please use your research to support your assertions.

Reference no: EM131326705

Questions Cloud

Lead to the most recent financial crisis : Explain the events that lead to the most recent financial crisis. In your opinion, who is to blame?

How does use of scenarios differ from sensitivity analysis : What is meant by a "real option"?- What is meant by the term overage for retail space?- How does the use of scenarios differ from sensitivity analysis?

Examine the tax legal and ethical issues in the given case : Examine the tax, legal, and ethical issues in the case, and comment on the manner in which the case was handled by the organization and by the regulatory authority. Propose your own solutions to the issues you identify in the case.

What is the btirr on each investment : What is the BTIRR on each investment?- If the BTIRR were partitioned based on BTCFo and BTCFs what proportions of the BTIRR would be represented by each?

What was the substance of your colleagues argument : The risk-benefit calculation for any drug assumes a correct diagnosis of the disorder. Many investigators and clinicians feel the current epidemic of child psychiatric disorders is largely due to inappropriate diagnosis. Evaluate the risk and bene..

What are the benefits of a corporate leadership strategy : As a leader in the first years of McDonald's, what kind of normative leadership style do you think Ray Kroc likely used? Explain your answer.

How your learning in business and accounting from the course : Make sure you explain why these concepts are most important to you. Explain how your learning in business and accounting from this course could be helpful to you throughout your career.

Evidence of diminishing marginal productivity inaction : Provide an evidence of diminishing marginal productivity inaction from your workplace or organization that you are familiar with. Might diminishing marginal productivity affect the costs of your business? Discuss this in your answer.

Investments considering both the risk and return on each : Mike Riskless is considering two projects.- He would like to know how he can compare the two investments considering both the risk and return on each. What do you suggest?

User Account

All Pages