Reference no: EM131009404
Please readd the case before answering the question.
https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/cases/2011/12/111221scanscoutdo.pdf
Now that you've had a chance to review the ScanScout case in general, it's time to focus on the relevant facts. The key word there is "relevant." Not all facts in a case are relevant facts, though typically an appellate opinion focuses most on the relevant ones.
When you read the ScanScout case, you will see a section in the case with the general facts that brought this case to court in the first place. Those facts will address "what happened" in the case. On other words, you will be looking for statements relating what one party has accused the other of doing.
Your assignment this week is to review the case and find the relevant facts. Do not confuse this section with the "issue." The issue section will be discussed later in this course. The facts only focus on what happened. The issue focuses on the question presented to the court. For this assignment, only find the facts and not the issue. To focus on the facts, make sure you think about what happened that led to this case. What was ScanScout accused of doing? What exactly led to the accusation here? Those are the facts you should be focused on.
You may choose to list the facts or write them out in paragraph form. When you submit your final case brief, your facts section must be in paragraph form but for this assignment, either is fine. Your finished work must be no less than 200 words. If you find yourself running short, then expand on your explanation of the facts.
Case briefs never have references. The appellate opinion is the only document you review when you write a case brief.
|
Apple excess return on two measures
: Apple stock Fit the multiple regression of the monthly Apple Excess Return on two measures of the overall market, the return on the whole market (Market Excess Return) and the S&P 500 index (SP500 Excess Return). Use only the 72 months during 2006..
|
|
Number of variables added to the model
: The statistical significance of changes to R2 depends on the number of variables added to the model. In these examples, the current regression has four explanatory variables with R2 = 0.60 and has been fit to n = 75 observations.
|
|
Evaluate any ethical challenges that you may run
: You must also evaluate any ethical challenges that you may run into while performing this job and how you would handle them while maintaining the highest level of integrity
|
|
Create small data set of about seven scores and demonstrate
: Create a small data set of about seven scores and demonstrate that adding or subtracting a constant to each score does not change the standard deviation. What happens to the mean when a constant is added or subtracted?
|
|
What was scanscout accused of doing
: To focus on the facts, make sure you think about what happened that led to this case. What was ScanScout accused of doing? What exactly led to the accusation here? Those are the facts you should be focused on
|
|
What hypothesize about central tendency and variability
: What would you hypothesize about central tendency and variability? Calculate the relevant descriptive statistics and graphics for each condition separately.
|
|
Find all relative and absolute maxima and minima
: Use graphing technology and the method in Example 5 to find the x-coordinates of the critical points, accurate to two decimal places. Find all relative and absolute maxima and minima.
|
|
Explanation of three challenges facing prisons today
: Explanation of three challenges facing prisons today and how they might impact prisons in the future. Be specific and use examples to illustrate your points
|
|
What would you conclude if the student got a score
: Moreover, even students who have never taken Psychology 1 would probably know who Pavlov was, or what we mean by sibling rivalry. Suppose that the exam above was our Psychology 1 exam, where each question had four alternative choices. What woul..
|