Reference no: EM133498661
Question 1: What other questions do you think your peer could/should ask that they haven't already?
Question 2: Explain whether you feel your peers' research questions do or do not meet the 5 criteria for an effective research question.
Question 3: What recommendations would you make to strengthen their question?
Question 4: Do you feel that your peer's working thesis is debatable? Does the thesis seem complete, clear, and well-composed? Ensuring that your comment is respectful, suggest a way your peers can strengthen their thesis.
Question 5: Are the two references formatted properly? What might your peer need to modify so that the reference is formatted correctly?
Post 1
When it comes to vaccines and autism, where do scientists stand now?
How might immunizations affect autism spectrum disorder? What pathways might be at play?
How does the frequency of autism differ between vaccinated and unvaccinated populations, according to epidemiological studies?
In what ways, if any, have debates regarding the safety of vaccines influenced public opinion, vaccination rates, or government health policy?
How do the advantages and hazards of vaccines stack up against the dangers of not getting vaccinated?
Post 2
Some questions that I ask myself about global warming are what is global warming? What are its causes? What are the effects of global warming in our societies, flora, fauna and Geography? What can we do to stop it? What would be the impact of global warming on earth if we do not act?
My primary research question would be: Should humanity be concerned about global warming, is it a real problem or an exaggerated lie?
Thesis statement: To ensure the temperature will not keep increasing, the sea level does not keep going up and consequently keep having stronger storms, humanity must act to stop global warming.