Reference no: EM133428040
1. Why do fathers don't show effort when it comes to there child and why wear the ring your fathers ring that he gave you in hope of change?
base the following questions below based on the question
2. Which 2 academic sources are THE most interesting? Write down the author(s) and title. For this activity, you need academic sources, so double-check.
3. Go down the rabbit hole with each of your authors. Write down some notes for each of the following items.
What's their expertise? I.e., what qualifies them as an expert on this subject?
What credentials back up their expertise? If they have a PhD, what's it in and/or what's their academic focus? I.e., what do they study? If they are alive, are they currently teaching anywhere? Are they on social media?
What else have they published?
Do they have a WikiPedia page and if so, what are some of the highlights?
What else is worth sharing?
4. Browse the bibliographies for the articles in your step 2 sources (if your source doesn't have a bibliography, it's not academic, and you'll need to choose something else).
Write up answers for 1 bibliography.
What academic article did you choose for this?
What's the oldest publication date you can find?
What's the most recent publication date you can find?
Are there any date clusters (lots of a similar pubication date)? Do some clever googling to see if you can find anything historically significant, but don't drain yourself doing it.
If you notice an author cited more than once, google them. Who are they? Are they a "big deal"?
What's the strangest / most unexpected source in the bibliography and why?
What is the most interesting / strange source in the bibliography and why? (Not the same as f.) Can you locate a copy?
If you were going to read a source listed in the bibliography, what would it be and why? Can you locate a copy in the UAlbany library databases? (If you hit a paywall, you aren't using the UAlbany library databases!)
5. a paragraph discussing what you learned through this activity. Are you getting a better sense of the academic conversation on your topic as a whole? If so, how? If not, what's confusing? What questions might you be able to raise that you hadn't thought of before?