Reference no: EM133803705
Case: Review Trump v. Vance, 591 U.S. and Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP, 591 U.S.
In your initial discussion post, discuss:
Question 1. Identify the facts and rulings in each case. What part of the Constitution was at issue in each case?
Question 2. Given these cases, explain (citing the law) whether a U.S. president has absolute immunity from prosecution: (a) while in office, and (b) when no longer in office.
Question 3. Do either or both United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974) and/or Clinton v. Jones, 520 US 681 (1997) provide support to Trump''s claims? Explain. Your Experts Are Ready - Hire Now!
Question 4. What legal or ethical influence, if any, did misinformation or disinformation have on the judicial analysis of any of these cases? Did they affect the evolution of this area of law? If not, is there a risk that it could? If so, how, and can that be avoided?
Question 5. What does your state provide regarding executive privilege for its governor, if anything? How does it compare to what is available for the president? If available, provide data about how the residents of this state feel about gubernatorial executive privilege.
Question 6. What specific language would you add to or change in the federal (or, if appropriate, for your state) Constitution so the issue of executive privilege can be clear and not open to interpretation?
a. Document how and why you would add the language you chose.
b. Assess the significance of your proposed change in light of the major debates or developments you have identified and analyzed in this Discussion.