Reference no: EM133474054

Assignment

Case study: Corporate Governance at Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia: Not "A Good Thing"

Case Synopsis: "The case opens with Martha Stewart's 2005 release from prison following her conviction for obstructing an insider-trading investigation of her 2001 sale of personal stock. The scandal dealt a crippling blow to the powerful Martha Stewart brand and drove results at her namesake company, Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia (MSO), deep into the red. But as owner of more than 90 percent of MSO's voting shares, Stewart continued to control the company throughout the scandal. The company faced significant external challenges, including changing consumer preferences and mounting competition in all of its markets. Ad rates were under pressure as advertisers began fragmenting spending across multiple platforms, including the Internet and social media, where MSO was weak. New competitors were luring readers from MSO's flagship publication, Martha Stewart Living. And in its second biggest business, merchandising, retailing juggernauts such as Walmart and Target were crushing MSO's most important sales channel, Kmart. Internal challenges loomed even larger, with numerous failures of governance while the company attempted a turnaround. This case can be used to teach either corporate governance or turnarounds. "

Case Study Question:

Question 1. What might management have done to stabilize revenue and reassure investors after Stewart's legal troubles surfaced? (1page)

Question 2. What were the internal and external symptoms of trouble in the years following Stewart's 2005 return to the company? (1page)

Question 3. Overall Conclusion of the case. (1page)

Follow the instructions carefully:

Include your best critical thinking and analysis to arrive at your justification.

Approach the assignment from the perspective of the company's senior executive leaders making a presentation to its board of directors.