Reference no: EM13927873

Intermediate Financial Management 12th Edition

Chapter 17 Mini Case

David Lyons, CEO of Lyons Solar Technologies, ia concerned about his firms level of debt financing. The company uses short term debt to finance its temporary working capital needs, but it does not use any permanent (long term) debt. Other solar technology companies average about 30% debt, and Mr. Lyons wonders why they use so much more debt and how it affects stocks prices. To gain some insights into the matter, he poses the following questions to you, his recently hired assistant.

Please Answer All Parts to this Question:

Part A: Business Week recently ran an article on companies' debt policies, and the names Modogliani and Miller (MM) were mentioned several times as leading researchers on the theory of capital structure. Briefly, who are MM, and what assumptions are embedded in the MM and Miller models?

Part B: Assume that firms U and L are in the same risk class and that both have EBIT= $ 500,000. Firm U uses no debt financing, and its cost of equity is Rsu (R subscript su)= 14%. Firm L has $1 million of debt outstanding at a cost of Rd=8%. There are no taxes. Assume that MM assumptions hold. 1) Find V,S,Rs, and WACC for Firms U and L. 2) Graph (a) the relationships between capital costs and leverage as measured by D/V and b) the relationship between V and D.

Part C: Now assume that Firms L and U are both subject to a 40% corporate tax rate. Using the data given in part b, repeat the analysis called for in b(1) and b(2) under the MM model with taxes.

Part D: Suppose investors are subject to the following tax rates: Td= 30% and Ts= 12%. 1) According to the Miller model, what is the gain from leverage? 2) How does this gain compare with the gain in the MM model with corporate taxes? 3) What does the Miller Model imply about the effect of corporate debt on the value of the firm; that is, how do personal taxes affect the situation?

Part E: What capital structure policy recommendations do the three theories (MM without taxes, MM with corporate taxes, and Miller) suggest to financial managers? Empirically, do firms appear to follow any one of these guidelines?

Part F: How is the analysis in part c different if Firms U and L are growing? Assume both firms are growing at a rate of 7% and that the investment in net operating assets required to support this growth is 10% of EBIT.

Part G: What if L's debt is risky? For the purpose of this example, assume that the value of L's operations is $4 million (the value of its debt plus equity). Assume also that its debt consists of 1 year, zero coupon bonds with a face value of $2 million. Finally, assume that L's volatility is .60 and that the risk free asset, Rrf, is 6%.

Part H: What is the value of L's stock for volatilities between .20 and .95? What incentives might the manager of L have if she understands this relationship? What might debtholders do in response?