Writing quality, including spelling & grammar ? Excellent use of language throughout, demonstrates expressiveness, precision, and clarity. Spelling, grammar, punctuation are all excellent, with no errors. ? Language is generally sound and clear throughout. Spelling, grammar, punctuation are good with very few and minor errors. ? Clear enough to be understood; minimal confused or unclear expression. Spelling, punctuation, grammar acceptable but could be improved. ? Clear enough to be understood. May have some confused or unclear expression. May have a few moderate or several minor issues with spelling, punctuation, grammar. ? Mostly unclear or confused expression. Major errors with spelling, grammar, punctuation. (10% of total mark) (8 – 10 marks (7 marks (6 marks (5 marks (<5 marks

Recommendations on reporting to CEO and Board ? Simple and effective reporting format and structure, where the CEO can ascertain the performance of the project, the projected progress, the risks, other potential problems/issues (accompanied by concise narratives) easily. The CEO does not need to seek further information from the project team. Professionally presented, and recommendations could be implemented without alternations. ? Effective reporting format and structure, where the CEO can ascertain the performance of the project, the projected progress, the risks, other potential problems/issues (accompanied by concise narratives) with minimal need for further information from the project team. Professionally presented, and recommendations could be implemented with minimal alternations. ? Reasonably adequate reporting format and structure, where the CEO can ascertain the performance of the project, projected progress, risks, other potential problems/issues (accompanied by narratives) with some need for further information from the project team.

Recommendations on reporting to Project team ? The most relevant data is chosen for reporting. Recommended reporting format is succinct. Report structure is simple and effective, allowing proactive identification of potential problems. Comprehensive recommendations on project governance process, including meeting frequency, participants’ roles & responsibilities, are backed up by sound justifications based on IPM concepts and best practice project management recommendations, & could be implemented without alternations. Takes international stakeholder audience into consideration, with special recommendations. ? Relevant data is chosen for reporting. Recommended reporting format is succinct. Report structure is effective, though additional information may be required to identify potential problems. Comprehensive recommendations on project governance process, including meeting frequency and participants, are based on IPM concepts and project management recommendations. Takes international stakeholder audience into consideration, with special recommendations.

Good (60 – 69%) Acceptable (50 – 59%) Unacceptable (<50%) Recommendations for pertinent cost & schedule tracking, including clear explanations of the reasons for and advantages of the chosen methods over other options. Demonstrates the application of relevant IPM concepts & theories. Understandable recommendations. Some minor alternations may be required before final submission (in a real work situation). Takes international stakeholder audience into consideration. Recommendations for pertinent cost & schedule tracking, including reasons for choosing the methods. Attempts to apply relevant IPM concepts & theories. Reasonably clear and understandable recommendations. Redrafting is required before final submission (in a real work situation). Some consideration of the international stakeholder audience. ? Recommendations do not address cost & schedule tracking requirements, no explanations given. Did not apply relevant IPM concepts & theories. Unclear and difficult to understand recommendations. A complete rewrite is required before final submission (in a real work situation).

CRITERIA Excellent (> 80 %) Very good (70 – 79%) Recommendations of methodology for tracking cost & schedule. ? Professionally structured recommendations for cost & schedule tracking, including clear & concise explanations of advantages of the chosen methods over other options. Insightful and skilful application of the IPM concepts & theories. Generally, a ‘senior management ready’ recommendation document. A rigorous tracking process but without burdening the team with reporting. Takes international stakeholder audience into consideration. ? Well-structured recommendations for cost & schedule tracking, including clear explanations of the reasons and advantages of the chosen methods over other options. Skilful application of the IPM concepts & theories. Easily understandable recommendations. Minimal or no redrafting required before final submission (in a real work situation). A good tracking process recommended but without burdening the team with reporting. Takes international stakeholder audience into consideration. (30% of total mark) (24 – 30 marks (21 – 23 marks

It is the most convenient tool which take the advantage of visualisation and improved team coordination tool to associate the cost and schedule values with each component of a 5D building model.) what does the expert want to say in this? ?read the first two lines and the last two lines, both say opposite, what am I suppose to say can we please get another expert to do the whole assignment again? this one is all wrong. 1. What kind of information to be provided to stakeholders and CEO in order to assure of the progress of the project as required 2. Advantages and the limitations of various methods suggested above these two sections have not been discussed in solution A. please elaborate it

again there is nothing done in solution B except the references. There are no headings, no intext references, the third dot point in the assignment (• There are several techniques used to control the cost of a project. 1. Earned value management: It is a mathematical method used to know the performance of the project. It also helps in monitoring cost and schedule of the project. As it is difficult to understand the EVM formulae, these inputs are used for other tracking methods. Other methods like forecasting, to-complete performance interest, variance analysis are also based on EVM formulae. As all the methods involve EVM formulae they are difficult to understand. An integrated basic information modelling (BIM) is used to improve the planning and construction of the project. An integrated time-cost management system (ITCMS) is also used for cost and schedule tracking. It consists of 4 modules-time and costs estimating, scheduling, visualization, EVM. With the aid of EVM, it ensures budget and schedule monitoring throughout the project.