Reference no: EM133487818
Conduct a search for an art controversy (from 1960 to present). Select artwork that interests you for the focus of this assignment. Address all points in the following two parts, using the bold headings, which are also provided below, to organize your information:
Part 1: Objective Analysis (Infographic or Essay):
Analyze the controversy by addressing each of the following. Reserve your opinion for Part 2. This part is researched information on the controversy and your own objective analysis. Please include appropriate, credible references and citations where necessary.
Description: Describe the artwork -- subject, medium, and form.
Pro-Con Analysis: Detail the opposing issues in the controversy. Analyze the pros. Analyze the cons. Be thorough. This will require a good deal of research.
Bias: Is bias involved on either side? Make sure to question the validity of viewpoints. Are facts presented just flat out inaccurate?
Assumptions: What assumptions were made? This may involve various things like the artist's intent, cost (Who is paying for it?), or sweeping statements like "Nobody wants this..." or "Everybody loves art..." The point is to consider these assumptions as you analyze the pros and cons.
Intent: What was the intent of the artist as far as emotional appeal? (This may be covered when explaining the issues. Do not repeat if already addressed.)
This analysis should be detailed with specific points for support whether you choose the infographic or essay format.
Part 2: Evaluation
Evaluate the work by addressing the following:
Position: What is your position on the controversy? Explain fully. Why do you hold this position? This can include your own suggestion for how the situation could have been handled better.
Biases & Influences: What are your own biases related to art? What influences your decision about art? For example, you may have had significant exposure to art when you were younger or you may think it's a waste of taxpayer money -- again, check your assumptions. Perhaps your community celebrates the arts with lots of festivals, or maybe it doesn't place a high value on public art (not many works in your community). Think about your own value system when addressing your position.
Conclusions & Implications: What conclusions can you draw about the controversy and art in general? What implications does the controversy have for art? Does art serve a positive purpose in our lives if it can create such discord?