Reference no: EM131987678
Assignment: Philosophy
Length: 400-500 words
Apa Format, no grammar errors. No plagiarism. (1" indent)
Part 1
Having experienced a robust debate discussion regarding if these two laws should be flexible, it is time to shift gears a bit and consider the broader implications of changing laws from an ethical and philosophical perspective.
Read the article "Laws should not constantly change" by Matthew Bransgrove to frame this week's discussion. Complete the following:
• What is your initial perspective after reading the article?
• Based on your review of the article, is there an ethical/philosophical consideration that supports/ challenges the article's considerations?
Part 2: Based on the first initial of your last name:
• First initial M-Z: provide an argument 'FOR' there being an ethical/philosophical reasoning for changing laws. Submit your position by posting in the Unit 2 Debate forum, under the 'FOR' topic.
In both considerations, provide research that supports your assertions.