Reference no: EM132227361
Robert Bresky applied for an account executive position at Blair Television, a New York firm that sells TV ad time. He had armed himself with a set of online videos and slides that highlighted his sales strengths. He was babbling away when the seemingly bored interviewer reached into her desk drawer and tossed a hand grenade on the table. “If you’re so good, sell me this,” she demanded. Bresky didn’t miss a beat. He picked up the grenade and said: “Ma’am, if you’re talking personal protection, this is the way to go. It’s portable, easy to use, and it’ll scare off even the toughest gang member.” No sale. “My tiny handgun fits in my pocket perfectly. That grenade will rip a hole in my blazer.” Recovering quickly, Bresky replied: “I was just about to mention that each grenade comes with a free holster. It’s guaranteed to protect your clothes, it’s unobtrusive, and it comes in your choice of color.” He got the job.
Explain reliability and validity as they pertain to selection criteria and selection procedures in general. How would you evaluate the reliability and validity of the selection procedure that Bresky faced? What is your estimate of the reliability of the procedure?
What specific method would you use to assess the reliability of the procedure? What is your estimate of the validity of the procedure? What specific method would you use to assess the validity of the procedure?
Considering the organizations using these popular selection procedures, what percentage do you estimate have evaluated the reliability and validity of these procedures? Explain how the failure to assess reliability and validity can make the hiring organization vulnerable.