Reference no: EM132458174
The following represent suggestions for how you might structure your critique:
Discussion 1: Start by discussing the background of the visualization, such as information about the publisher, source(s) of data used, and the general context of publication (i.e., What was happening in the world that motivated or gave meaning to the visualization?).
Discussion 2: Who appears to be the target audience(s) for this visualization? What qualities about the visualization and its context (i.e., where it is published) support your conclusion?
Discussion 3: What story - or stories - is the author of the visualization intending to tell? What insights were gained by visualizing the data in this way that text alone could not accomplish?
Discussion 4: What are some alternative ways to interpret the visualization that may not have been intended by the author? In what ways, if any, is the visualization potentially misleading?
Discussion 5: How, if at all, might the interpretation of the visualization change depending on who is reading the visualization? What factors might influence these changes (e.g., the identities of the reader, level of education, cultural familiarity)?
Discussion 6: What else strikes you about the visualization? How might Cairo and/or D'Ignazio suggest that it be improved based on their respective frameworks for creating visualizations?
Attachment:- data visualization.rar