40-49 Results suitably presented and described. Adequate description of procedures and aims. Some references given but relies on material provided. Referencing and presentation attempt to follow instructions given. 30-39 Incomplete results, little or no discussion. Inadequate description of experiment and aims. No or very few references given. Poor, inconsistent presentation. Incorrect structure. 0-29 No serious attempt to address the problem. Evidence of group working or plagiarism.

60-69 Results presented appropriately and discussion shows evidence of understanding of the subject matter. Other sections of the report are clear. Appropriate references used. Report is well-presented and correctly structured, with few errors in use of units, citation of references and format of graphs and tables. 50-59 Results suitably presented and described. Discussion shows evidence of consideration of the significance of the results. Adequate description of procedures and aims. Some references given beyond provided material. Report is generally consistent in presentation and follows instructions given with some errors.

GRADE CRITERIA Please refer to the grade descriptors given in the Student Handbook. The following table shows specific features of work at each grade for this particular coursework and level of study. Grade (%) Specific Features 80+ Results presented appropriately and discussion shows evidence of thorough understanding of the subject matter, showing some originality or creativity. Other sections of the report are clear and logical, making very good use of references beyond the material given. Report is well-presented, written in impersonal, past tense with no errors. 70-79 Results presented appropriately and discussion shows evidence of thorough understanding of the subject matter. Other sections of the report are clear and logical, making good use of references beyond the material given. Report is well-presented, written in impersonal, past tense with few or no errors.

I clearly identified the specifications and maintenance routines of the system. Overall presentation The structure of my report conforms to format provided by MTC My report is clear and concise I specify S.I. units for all values quoted My exhibits are correctly numbered and labelled I write in impersonal, past tense I make correct use of grammar, spelling and punctuation

Covering information My title/cover page clearly shows: My student number Assignment title Unit title Discussion I described the relevant aspects of the subject in questions I discussed the minimum requirement asked in each question. I consider the required aspects have been covered in the report. Other sections of the report I stated the complete solution of the report I briefly described sub-modules of the system. I showed relevant exhibits where required.