What is the rule of reason test in antitrust law

Assignment Help Management Theories

Reference no: EM131379246

One of the primary money-making operations that that the NFL has engaged in over the years has been the merchandising of goods, such as ball caps, jerseys, t-shirts, and so on, all of which bear the logo and/or colors of an NFL team. Throughout the 20th century, the NFL was satisfied to deal with a variety of vendors through a legal entity that it created known as National Football League Properties (NFLP).

Then, in the year 2000, NFLP decided to award an exclusive contract to Reebok. One former NFL merchandiser, American Needle, was, understandably enough, unhappy with the new arrangement. Consequently, American Needle brought a lawsuit against the NFL arguing that the Reebok contract established a monopoly that was in violation of Section One of the Sherman Antitrust Law. Section one makes it illegal to enter a contract, combination, or conspiracy in order to restrain trade.

Ordinarily under section one the court would apply what is known as the rule-of-reason standard, which asks judges to balance the pro-competitive results of a challenged arrangement with the anti-competitive results. In this case, however, a different tactic was used. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals took a more fundamental approach and targeted the very ability of the NFL to enter a contract of any sort.

The court ruled that the NFL was not a collection point around which a group of 32 different team joined forces but was, instead, a single entity. As a single entity, the NFL could not make any type of contract with itself, let alone a contract to restrain trade. This ruling means that section onedid not apply to the case and, as a result, the case was dismissed. The United States Supreme Court disagreed with the appellate court, however, and ruled that the NFL is not a single entity.

The Court said that, under corporate law, the NFL might be a single entity, but under antitrust law, it is not. The NFL turns out to be, at least for purposes of antitrust law, a collection of 32 distinct constituent parts, referred to as teams and headquartered in different cities, thatmake financial decisions on their own for their own purposes and benefit. (See American Needle, Inc. v. National Football League, 130 S.Ct . 2201 (2010).

See also Gabriel Feldman, "The NFL Is Not a Single Entity," The National Law Journal , February 1, 2010, p. 35; and Michael P. Waxman, " American Needle Inc. v. National Football League : Surprise! The Supreme Court Upholds an Existing Antitrust Doctrine," Marquette University Law School Faculty Blog , October 29, 2010, https://law.marquette.edu.)

Opening Case Questions
1. In American Needle, Inc. v. National Football League, the U.S. Supreme Court seems to admit that, under corporate law, the NFL might be a single entity. Is it appropriate to have two different areas of the law come to two entirely different outcomes when judging the same set of facts? Why or why not?

2. In relation to antitrust law, what is significant about the Supreme Court's ruling that the NFL is not a single entity? Explain.

3. What is the rule-of-reason test in antitrust law and how is it carried out? Explain.

4. What other test, besides the rule-of-reason test, is available in antitrust law? Explain.

5. Now that the U.S. Supreme Court has remanded the case, what happens next? Explain.

Reference no: EM131379246

Questions Cloud

Ethics for life class - discuss how thomas hobbes : Discuss how Thomas Hobbes and E. O. Wilson might explain Beamer's actions. Are you satisfied with their explanations? Support your answer.

Can harris bring a direct or a derivative suit in situation : Can Harris bring a direct or a derivative suit in this situation? Explain. Would the fairness rule or the business judgment rule be used to evaluate the activities of Fleure ? Explain.

What kind of display might be appropriate for these data : Dialysis. In a study of dialysis, researchers found that "of the three patients who were currently on dialysis, 67% had developed blindness and 33% had their toes amputated." What kind of display might be appropriate for these data? Explain.

What elements are needed to make a subpoena : Assignment Description: First, determine what elements are needed to make a subpoena, deposition, court order, and warrant legal. Describe your findings in a 1-page paper

What is the rule of reason test in antitrust law : In relation to antitrust law, what is significant about the Supreme Court's ruling that the NFL is not a single entity? Explain.- What is the rule-of-reason test in antitrust law and how is it carried out? Explain.

Determine the possible circumstances : Determine the possible circumstances under which the company should discontinue operations. Suggest key actions that management should take in order to confront these circumstances.

Define the laws that are applicable to this analysis : Define the laws that are applicable to this analysis and how it applies. How would your state (California) handle this issue? For help see Milliken v. Jacono, 2012 PA Super 284, 60 A.3d 133, 138 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2012)

What brief argument does stigler offer for his position : What brief argument does Stigler offer for his position in favor of government intervention in the economy? - What is the major objection that Coase has for opposing government intervention into the economy?

Consider differentiated bertrand model : Differentiated Bertrand. Consider a Differentiated Bertrand model in which demand is given by q1 = 100 – p1 + p2 and q2 = 100 – p2 + p1 for firm 1 and firm 2 respectively and where both firms faced zero fixed costs and constant marginal cost = c. Sup..

User Account

All Pages