Reference no: EM131378467
Instructions:
Read the chapter in the Polman book on Relativism (chapter 3) and then answer the following questions.
1. Explain, in your own words what cultural relativism is. How does this differ from ethical relativism? (pp. 48-49)
2. What is the difference between the weak dependency thesis for ethical relativism,and the strong dependency thesis? (pp. 50-51)
3. What, according to Pojman, is one of the benefits of accepting relativism (think in terms of the claims being made in the chapter about tolerance with respect to conventional relativism). What is the problem with claiming that ethical relativism entails tolerance? (pp. 55)
4. Explain the differences between the two types of ethical relativism: subjectivism and conventionalism.
Are you inclined to agree with one of these theories, or do you reject the idea that morality is relative?
Why or why not? (pp. 52-59)
5. One of the consequences of accepting the theory of ethical relativism is that we might be forced to tolerate the actions of other cultures, even if they are in serious conflict with the moral standards of our culture.
This is especially problematic when you think about the actions of a person such as Hitler.
It is possible that a consequence of accepting the truth of ethical relativism would be that we have to be tolerant of the actions of people like Hitler. Do you think this is one of the consequences of accepting ethical relativism?
And, if you are inclined to agree with relativism, are you okay with this consequence: that we have to tolerate the action of people like Hitler? Why or why not? (pp. 56)
Please make sure the answers are simple and not hard vocabulary.
The answers must be from the book :
Louis P. Pojman, how Should We Live?: An Introduction to Ethics
(Belmont, California: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2005).
Also, this is resource from the professor might help you to write and you can source it.
https://www.jimpryor.net/teaching/guidelines/writing.html.
The assignment are due less than 24 hours from now please make sure you finish it before due time so i can review it and answer the professor to all the questions.
|
How can the incident be communicated to other staff
: BSBMGT605 - Provide leadership across the organisation Learner Workbook Activities. In teams, or as directed by the instructor, explain your views or provide examples from your workplace on communicating results of incidents to relevant groups and..
|
|
Explain ethical challenges related to dual-roles
: Describe the professional role you selected, including services provided. Provide any background information you have in this area and explain why you decided to work, aspire to work, or why you have interest in this role.Describe the forensic set..
|
|
What average shearing force is carried by each bolt
: The reducer has a 4:1 ratio. Neglecting friction and weight, what average shearing force is carried by each bolt?
|
|
Discuss about the post given below
: Complete 2 (of the 3) chapter ending exercises (on Attribution, Reactance, and/or Equity Theory) on your own (do not post your answers!). Then, title your post accordingly (Attribution, Reactance, or Equity Theory, or a combination), writing up w..
|
|
What is the problem with claiming that ethical relativism
: Explain, in your own words what cultural relativism is. How does this differ from ethical relativism? (pp. 48-49) What is the difference between the weak dependency thesis for ethical relativism,and the strong dependency thesis? (pp. 50-51) What, a..
|
|
Would the case against british petroleum be a civil lawsuit
: Would the case against British Petroleum be a civil lawsuit or a criminal action? Explain.- Would a case against British Petroleum be brought in state or federal court or could it be brought in both? Explain
|
|
Write explanations for carrolls terminology
: Write explanations (2-3 sentences each) for some of Carrolls terminology that may be unfamiliar to general readers.
|
|
What alternatives are available to kerensky
: Consequently, he is apprehensive that a judge and jury will be lost by the technical jargon that may be used at trial. What alternatives are available to Kerensky.
|
|
Describe a time when you experienced cognitive dissonance
: What is cognitive dissonance? Describe a time when you experienced cognitive dissonance. How do theorists suggest that people reduce dissonance? How did you reduce yours? Describe the over justification effect and give an example that illustrates..
|