What is the harmless error rule on appeal

Assignment Help Business Law and Ethics

Reference no: EM131907472

Question: 1. Distinguish between the subjective test and the objective test used in determining whether a person is in custody for purposes of the Miranda warnings. If you are a police officer, which test would you prefer the courts use and why?

2. Based on Court decisions, give four situations when the Miranda warnings are not needed and explain why.

3. What is the "harmless error" rule on appeal? Give an example of its application in Miranda cases.

Reference no: EM131907472

Questions Cloud

What is meant by a clearly established constitutional right : Police officers are not liable in Section 1983 cases "unless they violate a clearly established constitutional or federally given right of which a reasonable.

What is evanec cost of retained earnings : What is Evanec's cost of retained earnings, rs? What is Evanec's cost of new common stock, re?

What does official immunity mean : What is the public duty doctrine? What is its main exception, and what does that exception mean? What does official immunity mean?

What is the public duty doctrine : Assume you are a police officer who has been unfairly sued by a suspect. Question 2, 3 Will you sue back? Why or why not?

What is the harmless error rule on appeal : Distinguish between the subjective test and the objective test used in determining whether a person is in custody for purposes of the Miranda warnings.

Find the minimum loss obtainable under an interest rate : ECON30852 Assignment - Find analytically: The minimum loss obtainable under an interest rate targeting regime

Are any of the drugs confiscated admissible in evidence : S, a university student, ran a red light and was stopped by the police. He was asked to get out of his car and was questioned about why he ran a red light.

Will you exclude or admit the statement : Officer P went to G's house, a juvenile gang member. G's family knew Officer P because he lived in the same neighborhood and was a family friend.

What standard will you use to justify your ruling : Defendant X claims he was in custody when interrogated by the police about a murder. Officer Y denies that claim and says that custody and arrest were farthest.

User Account

All Pages