I guess 1700 words enough because I'm going to do the results and discussion part sorry about the late reply I just saw the solution. It looks great how many words are there? 1900 words doesn't matter. I read the solution, it seems great. Thank you so much.

Hello guys, this is a scientific report. could you please do the introduction, Aims of practical, methods and reference parts. i will do the results, questions and discussion parts. Please read the practical and marking rubric carefully. on top of that they gave some articles about the disease please read those articles as well. do your best. thanks.

Reference List (any common style used in Medical Science is acceptable) 0-0.4 points Missing in-text citation and reference list 0.5 -0.9 points Either in-text citations or reference list is missing 1-1.9 points Some references but poor formatting 2-2.9 points References complete, with variable formatting 3 points References complete with consistent formatting Overall Score Inadequate 0 or more Unsatisfactory 8 or more Fair 16.5 or more Good 23 or more Excellent 30 or more

Discussion 0 -1.4 points Missing or incorrect. Does not interpret results. 1.5-2.9 points Discussion includes partial or oversimplified interpretation of Results 3-3.9 points Discusses the significance of most results with acceptable 4-4.9 points Good interpretation and mostly clear/correct discussion of 5 points Correct interpretation and clear discussion of significance of Results to a detail and complexity significance of Results high scientific level. Questions 0-1.4 points Missing, incorrect or incomprehensible 1-1.9 point Less than half the questions answered correctly. Insufficient detail. 2-2.9 points Half the questions answered correctly with good scientific understanding 3-3.9 points Most or all of the questions answered correctly, concisely and to a high scientific standard 4 points All of the questions answered correctly, clearly, concisely and to a high scientific standard

Results text 0-1.9 points Missing or incorrect information provided 2-2.9 points Incomplete description of results or results contain material that should be in discussion 3-3.9 points Basic description of results with reference to figures and tables in the text 4-4.9 points Good description of results with reference to all figures and tables in the text 5 points Clear and accurate description of results with reference to all figures and tables Figures (including diagrams) and Tables 0-1.4 points Missing, Poorly presented/ mostly incomplete 1.5-2.9 points Some figures and tables missing AND/OR legends missing or incomplete 3-3.9 points All Figures and Tables including Figure legends and titles. Presentation average. 4-4.9 points Clear and mostly consistent presentation of Figures and Tables and fairly comprehensive Figure legends and titles 5 points Clear, well presented, consistent style for Figures and Tables and comprehensive Figure legends and titles

Aims of the Prac 0-0.24 points Missing or incorrect 0.25-0.4 points Inappropriate, incomplete or unclear 0.5-0.9points Stated but not very clear, or copied verbatim from the manual 1-1.4 point Stated and reasonably clear 1.5 points Stated and articulated very well Materials and Methods 0-0.4 points Missing or incorrect 0.5-0.9 points Incorrect format for the materials and methods section eg lists. 1-1.9 point Either insufficient or too much detail present. Poor presentation 2-2.9 points Generally sufficient and accurate detail present. Good presentation 3 points Excellent detail present. Accurate. Exemplary presentation.

PERNICIOUS ANAEMIA EXAMPLE RUBRIC – (Please check on CloudDeakin for the final version of the rubric as it may have been modified since this manual was published). Criteria Missing Unsatisfactory Fair Good Excellent Title, Author and Introduction to the Prac 0-0.9 points Missing title, author and/or Introduction 1 -1.9point Missing either title, author or Introduction 2-2.9points Title and Introduction missing, but Introduction not complete 3-3.9 points Title included. Introduction included and fairly comprehensive, referencing fair 4 points Title included and Introduction very well articulated, referencing good