Reference no: EM133548902

Question: in this case analysis 4 p172 in the book thinking critically about ethical issues the parties involved are the california judge the sacramento woman her 5 years old son and his dad i strongly believe that it is right for the judge to tell the woman that she had to stop smoking around her son and the judge really had the moral considerations in this case the judge believed that secondhand smoke was seriously harmful to the 5 years old boys health it is not only moral how the judge felt but its been supported by statistics for years in the us because secondhand smoke is very dangerous due to the statistics about secondhand smoking in the us been so true the judge used these statistics to justify his decision to order the woman to stop smoking around her 5 years old son but in the us judicial system and courts of law the main job of judges is to uphold the law not morals even though us laws were created because of what is supposed to be morally right in us society standards the 5 years old mother would be wrong for smoking around her 5 years old sonThe