Reference no: EM131434223
Using these questions as guidelines, write a 2-4+ page typed critique. Staple your critique to the back of your peer's essay. Turn in his/her marked, commented-upon essay with your critique.
1 In general, what do you like best about this essay? What is convincing?
2 What makes you think? Is there anything creative that is especially effective?
3 Is this topic one that was specifically recommended? If not, what makes it work for this assignment? Or if it doesn't quite work, can you suggest a way to adjust it?
4 Is the author's opinion obvious to you? (It shouldn't be.) How can s/he provide more balance?
CHARACTERS
1 Is each character both credible and necessary? Would an "undecided student" help to clarify things? To what extent is the character a stereotype? Specifically how can the writer make the character less predictable?
2 In one or two sentences, explain each character's point of view as you see it, and then analyze the relative quality of each. Remember, all characters and their arguments should be strong; each character should contribute to the discussion in a positive way. Avoid making the debate "realistic" if that means one side is unimpressive.
ARGUMENTS
1 Can you think of specific arguments that will need to be covered in the next draft? (For example, in an essay about capital punishment, does the author leave out racial or financial aspects?) Which arguments are the strongest to you at this point? Do any overpower the others? Which are still somewhat weak?
2 Has the author incorporated philosophical arguments yet? If so, did they seem appropriate? What "big questions" can you suggest adding? (The more, the better...)
3 What needs to be developed further? What still seems vague or undeveloped? What additions/clarifications should be made? What is the weakest part of the essay so far?
4 Is there anything else that should be covered?
1 Go over your copy of the essay carefully, circling mechanical and MLA errors. If you can, comment on recurring grammatical or spelling errors.
|
Discuss the systems development life cycle
: Discuss the systems development life cycle as applied to project management: Initiation, Planning, Acquisition or design and development, Implementation, Operations/Maintenance, Disposition/Disposal
|
|
Discuss the systems development life cycle
: Discuss the systems development life cycle as applied to project management: Initiation, Planning, Acquisition or design and development, Implementation, Operations/Maintenance, Disposition/Disposal
|
|
How can he avoid making the same mistake in the future
: So the guy removed snow from a wrong car. So what? Was he efficient, effective, neither, or both? How can he avoid making the same mistake in the future?
|
|
Reformulate the statement of shareholders equity
: Reformulate the statement of shareholders equity and the balance sheet and income statement for Chevron 2016. The explanation of what you did for the scoring would be most important
|
|
What is convincing and what makes you think
: In general, what do you like best about this essay? What is convincing and what makes you think? Is there anything creative that is especially effective?
|
|
Determine from a configuration file
: Determine from a configuration file stored as a text file (created in a text editor) on the web server the following:
|
|
Implement a processor datapath
: Assume that the logic blocks needed to implement a processor's datapath have the following latencies:
|
|
Have you identified the right tools and technology
: Have you identified the right tools and technology? Are infrastructure and security in place? Do we have the right implementation partner identified?
|
|
How can cji assure continued contract compliance
: Should CJI continue to use Heavey to supply pumps, should they make them in-house, should they consider one of the other suppliers, or should they do some combination of these alternatives? Discuss the advantages, disadvantages, and risks of each ..
|