What is carroll saying about nature of rhetorical analysis

Reference no: EM132491564

Discussion: Understanding Context and Research

Reflection

Instructions

In a fully developed short essay (minimum of eight paragraphs in length), please answer all of the questions below and post your essay to the discussion Forum. Your work should include an introduction, a body of supporting evidence, and a conclusion.

Remember that you are having a conversation with your peers in this particular genre of writing, so adopt an appropriate tone and vocabulary for an audience of contemporary college students. Edit your work for clarity, punctuation, and usage, and don't forget to comment on the works of two peers in order to earn full credit for these discussions.

Questions for Analysis

Question 1. What is Carroll saying about the nature of rhetorical analysis? How do the fundamentals of rhetorical analysis figure into your life, both as a student and as a citizen? Describe a pair of specific examples in which these concepts might play (or have played) a role in your participation in those areas.

Question 2. Using at least one citation from Carroll's essay, comment on the role of context in framing contemporary arguments. Is there enough contextual background on news stories, speeches, advertisements, and other areas of rhetoric in today's digital information culture? How does the Washington Post's proposed feature of the "Knowledge Map" enrich the contemporary news environment?

Question 3. Finally, in the second half of your essay, explain to your classmates the general features of your research argument. Using the taxonomies of reflection in the previous section as a guide, answer the following questions in your final four paragraphs:
a. What did you learn about your topic that you didn't already know or that was surprising to you?
b. What is an area that you would like to improve upon as a writer moving forward, and which aspect of your research argument are you most proud of?
c. Finally, how do you see the subject of your research argument changing over the course of the next ten years? Where will it be in a decade's time?

Reference no: EM132491564

Questions Cloud

Determine variable costing analysis with an example : Determine Variable costing analysis with an example. Describe what you learned about this topic and how variable costing differs from absorption costing.

Stocks from the most risky to the least risky : Rank these stocks from the most risky to the least risky.

Would voluntarily disclose the study information : If you were a manufacturer of one of the drugs, would you voluntarily disclose the study information? Why or why not? Stanford University medical researchers

Data Communications Assignment : Data Communications Assignment - What type of device could be used to connect the multiple signals from both voice and data

What is carroll saying about nature of rhetorical analysis : What is Carroll saying about the nature of rhetorical analysis? How do the fundamentals of rhetorical analysis figure into your life, both as a student

Why negotiations fail : Why Negotiations Fail? Explain the process taken in the negotiation effort and then explain how or at which point the negotiation failed.

What is the annualized forward discount : Assume the spot rate on the BRL:USD is $0.213/1 BRL and the 180 day forward rate on the BRL:USD is $0.202/1 BRL.

How much authority does an employee have to bind : How much authority does an employee have to bind a business into certain contracts which may or may not benefit the business? Find a case that you.

What is the cost of the project : In year 5, the firm would receive the OCF you calculated in question 6. What other adjustments are needed to the year 5 cash flow?

User Account

All Pages