Reference no: EM131166026
SUCCESS FROM FAILURE
Few niches crashed more spectacularly during Web 1.0 than the pet sector. In 2000, over just nine months, Pets.com managed to raise a jaw-dropping $82.5 million in an IPO, air a $1.2 million Super Bowl ad starring its sock puppet mascot, land funding from Amazon.com build a network of cavernous warehouses ... and go out of business without making a penny in profit. When Pets.com rolled over and died in November 2000, it presaged scores of dot-com disasters to follow and slammed the door on online pet businesses, seemingly for good. So when San Francisco Web designer Ted Rheingold co-founded Dogster.com in January 2004 as a kind of canine version of Friendster, the news drew smirks from the few who bothered to notice. How could Dogster, a pet site cobbled together on weekends and launched on a shoestring budget, expect to succeed where lavishly funded pet sites had flamed out? The consensus on Dogster was unanimous: It would fail. And indeed, it has failed. Over and over. But, alas, each knock has been a boost.
Dogster has discovered ways to turn its mistakes into better features. With pretty much no promotion, Dogster (and sister site Catster.com) has evolved into a premier pet lover's social network. Membership exceeds 275,000; the site features 340,000 photos and profiles of dogs and cats, and a blue-chip advertising list that includes Disney, Holiday Inn, and Target. Dogster, come to find out, has a good profit sheet. In many ways, the site is a prime example of how a Web deployment fails, but fails well by quick feature launch, seeing what works, and fixing things fast. According to Rheingold, "When we roll out a new feature, we know we're probably not going to get it right the first time." Dogster and similar companies have discovered that continually reviewing user data-most importantly, the discouraging events-provides important direction for enhancements. Says Rheingold, "Instead of working on a feature for months trying to get it perfect, we'll work on something for two weeks and then spend two or three days listening to users and fine-tuning it."
QUESTIONS:
1. Do you agree with Dogster's view, or should companies aim for "zero-defect" operations? Why or why not? What implications does this business model have for systems analysts?
2. Startup companies like Dogster are not the only companies that are implementing the "fail fast" strategy. Large companies like Google have used it and are still using it-in Google's case, with the implementation of the Google Toolbar. Cite another company that has used this strategy. Has it been successful?
Which of the following would not be considered a public good
: Which of the following would NOT be considered a public good? Chris buys pizza for his football party and he gets to decide who will have a slice of his pizza. This means his pizza is __________
|
Generate in order to reach the break-even point
: Ritz Furniture has a contribution margin ratio of 0.15. If fixed costs are $171,800, how many dollars of revenue must the company generate in order to reach the break-even point?
|
How can you make improvements with a new system
: What does the credit card charge form indicate about the existing system? How can you make improvements with a new system?
|
Explain the four elements of negligence
: Discuss the court's findings and explain how the court determined this was a negligence case rather than an intentional tort. Explain the four elements of negligence and the reasoning of the court when analyzing each element.
|
What implications does the business model have for systems
: Do you agree with Dogster's view, or should companies aim for "zero-defect" operations? Why or why not? What implications does this business model have for systems analysts?
|
What are ebit under the best case scenario
: The estimated sales price is $80 a unit, plus or minus 4 percent. Variable costs are estimated at $55 a unit, plus or minus 5 percent, and the fixed costs are $25,000, plus or minus $25,000. What are EBIT under the best case scenario?
|
Develop a c program
: develop a C program for Linux called pipes.c that does the following: In the main() function, it creates a pipe using the pipe() function, then creates two child processes with fork(). Child 1 redirects stdout to the write end of the pipe and then ex..
|
What techniques can you use to identify improvements
: What techniques can you use to identify improvements? Choose one technique and apply it to this situation- what improvements did you identify?
|
Explain the costs and the benefits of the production
: Why do you think your policy would work in reducing the total amount of emissions? In your answer, explain the costs and the benefits of the production and consumption of the good, as well as the negative externality
|