Reference no: EM133479218

Problem A. Explain how one historical event contributed to the development of the body of law that we know as Equity, and how it relates to modern day equitable principles.

Problem B. With reference to case law, what is the difference between a presently existing right and an expectancy? Give an example of each.

Problem C. What matters does an applicant seeking relief based on s 20 of the Australian Consumer Law need to prove?

Problem D. What factors will a court consider when faced with an application for an interlocutory injunction? Cite an appropriate authority.

Problem E. In what circumstances would you apply the 'list certainty' test? What does the test entail?

Problem F. Would a trust established to fund lobbying of the Government to introduce blasphemy laws be a valid charitable trust? Explain why or why not.

Problem G. A client approaches you for advice because they want to establish a trust to help funnel bribes to a local council. Would such a trust be valid? Explain why or why not.

Problem H. A Sydney based professional trustee, enthralled by the latest crypto-boom, moves all of a trust's assets into Bitcoin. Identify a duty that the trustee has breached, how it is breached, and the source of duty in legislation and case law.

Problem I. In what circumstances would a plaintiff seek a proprietary remedy (rather than equitable compensation) from a defaulting trustee?

Problem J. Identify an equitable doctrine or principle that remains good law in Australia, but that you think is improper or antiquated. Explain why you consider the doctrine to be improper or antiquated, with reference to legislation and/or case law.