I hope the expert had gone through the requirements and through the rubric, seen how many point it is. Only need peer review articles and professional PowerPoint nice pictures and clean use of bullets. Speak note should be excellent Please, this is not for Australia or India and in the United States My assignment was delivered before time, all the solutions were of high quality and standard, very quick and polite response on mail. I am very much impressed by the solution.

APA There is some attempt at APA formatting and citing. There are one or more missing parts such as the cover page or references list. Citation information may be missing. Citation mistakes make authorship unclear. This is an attempt use APA formatting and citing. There are both in-text citations and reference listings. Citation information may be missing or incorrect (i.e. Websites listed as in-text or reference citations). There is an attempt to cite all outside sources in at least one place. Authorship is generally clear. There is an overall attempt at APA formatting and citation style. All sources appear to have some form of citation both in the text and on a reference list. There are some formatting and citation errors. Citations generally make authorship clear. There is a strong attempt to cite all sources using APA style. Minor paper formatting errors such as a misplaced running head or margins may occur. Minor in-text citation errors such as a missing page number or a misplaced date may occur. Quotation marks and citations make authorship clear. 4 10% 0.40

Writing Deduction Rubric (everyone starts with 4's = no deductions) Introductory Emergent Practiced Proficient/Mastered Score Weight Final Score 0-1 2 3 4 Grammar & Punctuation The overall meaning of the paper is difficult to understand. Sentence structure, subject verb agreement errors, missing prepositions, and missing punctuation make finding meaning difficult. Several confusing sentences or 1 to 2 confusing paragraphs make understanding parts of the paper difficult, but the overall paper meaning is clear. Many subject verb agreement errors, run-on sentences, etc. cause confusion. A few confusing sentences make it difficult to understand a small portion of the paper. However, the overall meaning of a paragraph and the paper are intact. There may be a few subject verb agreement errors or some missing punctuation. There are one or two confusing sentences, but the overall sentence and paragraph meanings are clear. There are a few minor punctuation errors such as comma splices or run-on sentences. 4 35% 1.40

Create a convincing argument based on research of the topic. Makes an evaluation or judgment about the issue based on criteria that has been researched. The assignment does not address any or all of this section. The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly. Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis). Group project demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking (legal synthesis of malpractice case). 10% 0.00 Declares that a certain policy should or should not be created. The assignment does not address any or all of this section. The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly. Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis).

Reflects thoughtful and meaningful application of the policy argument. The assignment does not address any or all of this section. The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly. Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis). Group project demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking (legal synthesis of malpractice case). 10% 0.00 Proposition of Policy: declares that a certain policy should or should not be created. The assignment does not address any or all of this section. The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly. Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis). Group project demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking (legal synthesis of malpractice case). 10% 0.00

Assignment/Project Rubric Unit 6 assignment grading rubric. Instructors: Enter total available points in cell H2, and values between 0 and 4 in the yellow cells in the Score column. Content Rubric Introductory Emergent Practiced Proficient/Mastered Score Weight Final Score 0 - 1.9 2 - 2.9 3 - 3.9 4 Professional in appearance and tone. The assignment does not address any or all of this section. The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly. Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis). Group project demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking (legal synthesis of malpractice case). 10% 0.00 Reflects thoughtful and meaningful application of the policy argument. The assignment does not address any or all of this section. The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly.