What does the fair equality of opportunity interpretation

Reference no: EM133346429

Question: Rawls proposes two interpretations of the phrase "open to all," in the second principle of justice. What does the "fair equality of opportunity" interpretation add to the "careers open to talents" interpretation?

- Explain the difference between an ideal theory (of justice) and a non-ideal theory.

Reference no: EM133346429

Questions Cloud

Describe baron dholbachs views on determinism : Consider the example of touching a hot plate and pulling your hand back without even thinking about it. Would d'Holbach describe this as a free action?

What is it in the case of philosophical reflection : Philosophical reflection is like an X-ray machine.' What is it in the case of philosophical reflection that corresponds to the skeleton that the X-ray machine

Explain william james view of pragmatic maxim and pragmatism : Explain William James' view of pragmatic maxim and pragmatism. Explain how pragmatism (William James) and logical positivism (A. J. Ayer) would differ

Provide an evaluation and critique of their stance on issue : Choose an ethical issue you want to put down about. It could be from your own life, something in the news, or something about which you're passionate.

What does the fair equality of opportunity interpretation : What does the "fair equality of opportunity" interpretation add to the "careers open to talents" interpretation? - Explain the difference between an ideal

Discuss in some detail the main issues concerning : Briefly explain the key issues that are brought up on pages 1-5. (For example, those stemming from Epicurus, Seneca, death & life, authenticity, etc.)

How would kants philosophy diagnose the problem : How would Kant's philosophy diagnose the problem of "white ignorance," as Charles Mills explains the concept, and to what extent can it generate viable solution

What is atheism and what is agnosticism : What is atheism? What is agnosticism? What is the difference between the two? What is Occam's razor? How might one employ Occam's razor in an argument

Explain how these perspectives can run into conflict : What are the three varieties of moral reasons one might employ to determine what the right thing to do is in any given situation?

User Account

All Pages