Reference no: EM131421842 
                                                                               
                                       
Assignemnt
1.  After reading the article by Patel, Smith, Fitzsimmons, Kara &  Detmer (2012), reflect on the data collection methods and the analysis  strategies that were used to assess the data. Address the following  questions in your post:
What were the key data collection methods used, and how did they align with the focus of the research?
What were the analysis strategies used, and how did they align with the type of data that was collected during the study?
What do  you feel are the particular strengths of the data collection and  analysis of this article? What do you consider the weaknesses of this  approach?
References
Patel,  N., Smith, R., Fitzsimmons, K., Kara, M., & Detmer, E. (2012).  Utilizing goal setting strategies at the middle level: Helping students  self-regulate behavior. Networks: An On-line Journal for Teacher  Research, 14(2), 1-9.
2. Data Collection
As you  consider the construction of your data gathering instruments, use the  following questions and explanations by Sagor (2011) to guide you.
•	What are three data sources will you use for your AR?
•	Do you need a matrix for data triangulation?
•	Is the process I am using to answer my question clear enough that my students (clients or participants) can understand it?
When  collecting and analyzing data, action researchers can do a great deal to  ensure the validity and reliability of their findings by using a  process called triangulation. The term triangulation refers to the use  of multiple independent data sources to corroborate findings. The  purpose and necessity of corroboration is the same for the action  researcher as it is for the trial lawyer. A trial lawyer knows that to  convince a jury of the accuracy of a legal theory, it helps to have more  than one witness; the more individual witnesses whose testimony  supports the theory, the more credible the theory becomes (Sagor, 2002,  p. 16-18).
Educational  action researchers usually have a wide variety of data sources  available to them. Some of the most common data sources are the  following:
Existing data
•	School/teacher records
•	Referrals to the principal
•	Attendance records
•	Tardies
•	Classroom behaviors (talk outs/negative behaviors)
•	Number of detentions (per student)
•	Number of suspensions (per student)
•	Student work/portfolios
Observation data
•	Photographs
•	Videotapes
•	Diaries, logs, journals
•	Rating scales/rubrics
•	Data obtained by shadowing students through the school day
Probes
•	Tests
•	Surveys
•	Interviews
•	Focus groups
You, as  the researcher, will describe the instruments and data gathering  techniques used. You must establish criteria for selecting the data as  they relate to the scope of the problem.
A  helpful tool for planning data collection and triangulation is a  triangulation matrix-a simple grid that shows the various data sources  that will be used to answer each research question. The matrix provides  the action researcher with some assurance that the potential for bias  (which is always present whenever a single source of data is used) won't  take on undue significance. Figure 2.3 illustrates how a completed  triangulation matrix for a study on student editing might look.
Figure 2.3. Triangulation Matrix-Study on Student Editing
| 
 Issues to pay attention to when trying to   answer research question 
 | 
 Data Source #1 
 | 
 Data Source #2 
 | 
 Data Source #3 
 | 
| 
 What is the relationship between student enjoyment of writing   and the quality of their editing?  
 | 
 Student survey 
 | 
 Analysis of first, second, and final drafts 
 | 
 Comparison with work on previous assignments 
 | 
| 
 In what ways will providing students with a copy of a scoring   rubric impact the quality of their finished papers?  
 | 
 Student interviews 
 | 
 Contrast between revisions made in assignments without rubrics   and ones with rubrics 
 | 
 Third-party assessments of finished products 
 | 
| 
 To what extent are the finished papers different when students   use peer editors? 
 | 
 Student interviews 
 | 
 Contrast between revisions made in assignments without peer   editing and ones completed with peer editing  
 | 
 Third-party assessments of finished products 
 | 
Adapted from: Sagor, R. (2002). Guiding school improvement through action research. Alexandria, VA: ASCD. pp. 8-16.
Your Task
Submit  at least one of the data gathering instruments you have selected, or at  least one of the instruments you have constructed along with an  explanation. Please be sure to include your explanation for what you  have chosen or designed - focus on how you see it connecting to your  proposed project/research question. Attach the data-gathering instrument  (surveys, pre tests, etc.) to the assignment submission.
Please  also include a triangulation chart showing the ideas you have for the  remainder of your data collection. You will need to develop the other  tools for the final proposal as well, but for this assignment, you are  submitting one to show your thinking and to get feedback about your  ideas in the triangulation matrix. After you get instructor feedback on  this, you can continue to develop your ideas and add them to your AR  proposal.
3. Data Analysis
During  data analysis, the teacher researcher engages in a systematic effort to  search for patterns or trends in the data. There are many ways to  accomplish this. Regardless of the particular technique employed, during  the analysis phase the researcher tries to systematically cut, sift,  and sort the data into piles of like or similar objects. The key purpose  of this systematic sorting and categorizing is to assist in answering  the following two questions:
•	What is the story told by my data?
•	What might explain this story?
These  two questions help us to frame out what can be learned from the data  analysis process. While you will not formally implement your proposal  during this course, you need to consider how to work with the answers  that your data offers. Asking these kinds of questions and exploring the  themes that can arise from the work can direct your interpretations.  Once the researcher believes the process has resulted in adequate  answers to those two questions, it is time for the researcher to take a  critical look at the initial AR goal and ask how it may need to be  revised based upon the analysis of the data (Sagor, 2002, p. 8-16).
Using  the triangulation matrix that you created on #2 as a base, brainstorm  some ideas for how you think you would analyze the data that results  from your collection methods. Be conscious of the approach that your  data suggests (qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods) and make  appropriate selections. Share your ideas for the analysis strategies. Be  sure to include 2-5 possible themes that you expect to emerge from the  data that you would collect. Remember that these are thoughts about  where you might end up at the end of the work based on the experiences  of others and your familiarity with your context and professional  experiences.
References
Sagor, R. (2002). Guiding school improvement through action research. Alexandria, VA: ASCD. pp. 8-16.
Article:  Utilizing goal setting strategies at the middle level: Helping students  self-regulate behavior by Nimisha Patel, Rachel Smith, Kristen  Fitzsimmons, McGee Kara, and Emily Detmer.