In the section "Distinctive investments of R&D by Nestle to increase revenues", it is mentioned about the different supply chain in different regions with the examples from Nestle. The points are highlighted in yellow and written in bold and italics and the discussion and examples from Nestle regarding supply chain are marked in yellow.

I heavily rely on your words to deliver a high standard work. I have made the payment and hope to receive confirmation on receipt of Funds from your end. Good papers will have then reviewed the theory and the literature, with the emphasis on peer reviewed articles rather than textbooks or white pages. Finally the paper would consider how the obstacle could be overcome by applying elements of the theory to the specific situation of the example. The best papers would have considered alternative ways to overcome the obstacle, together with their advantages and limitations, as well as examples of different approaches. What is to be improved Establishment of relevant theory (e.g. How supply chain environments are differentiated from region to region?). This was needs to be well established. Critical analysis evident, with some evaluation and synthesis, although limited. Limited evidence of reflection.

Criteria Marks Use of theory 30 Examples 30 Quality of argument 10 Reference to course ideas 10 Citation and References 10 Conclusions 10 Please remember that marks for assignment will also be awarded in relation to presentation and structure, and aspects such as use of examples, figures, tables, illustrations and statistics that indicate wider/independent reading.

The maximum word count is 3000 words (+/-­­- 10%). You will also need to consider the following when completing your assignment: • Quality of executive summary (does it give a brief complete summary of your paper for an executive to read?) • Establishment of relevant theory (e.g. how supply chain environments are differentiated from region to region?) • Allocation of credit and sources used (have I included references and citations to the material I have used?) • Clarity of argument • Overall report presentation including spelling and grammar • Adherence to nominated word limit (+/-­­- 10%) • Word processed (letter size 12, times new roman, 1.5 space) • Fully referenced (Harvard Referencing System).