Reference no: EM131642995

Answer the following in 4-5 sentences.

1. What are the normative implications of Schuldt et al (2011)?

2. Name one problem with the methodology in Schuldt et al 2011 and discuss the implications for the findings?

3. What are the normative implications of Boykoff and Boykoff (2004)?

4. Name one problem with the methodology in Boykoff and Boykoff 2004 and discuss the implications for the findings?

5. What are the normative implications of Nelson et al (1997)?

6. Name one problem with the methodology in Nelson et al 1997 and discuss the implications for the findings?

7. What are the normative implications of Brader (2005)?

8. Name one problem with the theory behind Brader (2005) and discuss the implications of the problem?

9. What is the contradiction between Brader and Huddy et al's findings and theory

10. Name one problem with the theory behind Huddy et al (2005) and discuss the implications of the problem?

Resources :

1. Balance as bias: global warming andthe US prestige press By Maxwell T. Boykoff,Jules M. Boykoff.

2. Striking a Responsive Chord: How Political Ads Motivate and Persuade Voters by Appealing to Emotions By Ted Brader.

3. GLOBAL WARMING OR CLIMATE CHANGE ?WHETHER THE PLANET IS WARMING DEPENDS ON QUESTION WORDING By JONATHON P. SCHULDT and SARA H. KONRATH and NORBERT SCHWARZ.

4. Threat,  Anxiety, and Support of  Antiterrorism  Policies By Leonie  Huddy and Stanley  Feldm and Charles  Tabe and Gallya  Lahav.

5. Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflict and its Effect on Tolerance By Thomas E. Nelson and Rosalee A. Clawson and Zoe M. Oxley.