Reference no: EM133624965
1) The first section should answer three questions:
· What did the study aim to find?
· What was the methodology (Quantitative? Qualitative? Both?)?
· What were the conclusions or findings?
2) The second section focuses on your critique of the article.
· What are the limitations of the study? Is the study size large enough to provide statistical significance/validity? Was there any bias evident?
· What is missing from the study?
· What could the study have done differently?
· What conclusions can be drawn from the information the study provides?
· What directions for future research on the same topic are suggested by the article?
Article: Léger-Goodes, T., Malboeuf-Hurtubise, C., Hurtubise, K., Simons, K., Boucher, A., Paradis, P.-O., Herba, C. M., Camden, C., & Généreux, M. (2023). How children make sense of climate change: A descriptive qualitative study of eco-anxiety in parent-child dyads. PLoS ONE, 17(4), 1-25.