What are the inclusion and exclusion criteria of sample

Reference no: EM131443923 , Length: word count:1500

Assessment: Critical analysis of nominated literature

Aim of assessment -

The aim of this assessment item is to enable students to explore, in detail, the research process by critically analysing a journal article.

Details -

Using the appropriate guide, provided on p. 12 or p. 19 in this Learning Guide, critically analyse one of the papers available in the assessment tab on vUWS.

Please use research methods literature to inform the critical analysis. The assessment must comply with the following:

Students must respond to each of the questions provided in the guide for analysis using academic writing. It is anticipated that the work will be presented in a question / answer format using full sentences and paragraphs.
Referencing must be presented according to Section 4,3 Citing Resources and References in this learning guide
A minimum of 3 recent academic references must be used (published no earlier than 2012).
The questions provided in the guide and reference list are not included in the word limit
Refer to section entitled Submission of Assessment Tasks for guidance regarding word limit and further formatting / submission detail

Resources -

i. Examples may be available on the vUWS site.

ii. There are a number of textbooks and resources available through the Western Sydney University Library that may assist you. Please refer to the unit's vUWS site for specific unit resources

Critical analysis of nominated literature (QUALITATIVE) -

Please use the questions provided in this guide to analyse the qualitative journal article (available in the assessment tab on vUWS). When answering each question please explain and justify responses with reference to the current literature.

1. Background of the study

a. Briefly describe the health issue of the study's focus.

b. What is the significance of the study?

2. Overview of research design

a. What was the aim of the research?

b. What research design was used?

c. Was it appropriate? Why/why not?

3. Sampling

a. Who were the study participants?

b. What are the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the sample?

c. Why is it important to have these criteria identified before recruitment?

d. What sampling technique was employed in this study?

e. Was it appropriate for the research design? Why/why not?

f. How was the sample size determined?

g. Was it appropriate? Why/why not?

4. Data collection

a. How was the data collected?

b. Was the data collection method appropriate for the study question and the research design? Why/why not?

c. Define the concept of rigor.

d. Discuss two measures taken/not taken to ensure rigor.

5. Data analysis/results

a. Identify and describe the method of data analysis.

b. Was it appropriate? Why/why not?

c. What were the findings?

d. Can the study findings be used in other settings? Why/why not?

6. Evidence utilization

a. Would you recommend the findings of this study be implemented in clinical practice? Why/why not?

7. Academic writing

a. Sentence, paragraph, and grammatical construction were correct.

b. Spelling and use of punctuation were correct.

8. Referencing

a. Critique supported by relevant literature.

b. Recent academic references were used published from 2012 to present.

c. Referencing in-text and in reference list conforms to APA 6th Edition referencing style.

Attachment:- Article.rar

Reference no: EM131443923

Questions Cloud

Describe the differences between flash point : Describe the differences between flash point, fire point, and auto-ignition temperature. Which are more stable, combustible liquids or flammable liquids? Why?

Suggest an effective management information system : Suggest an effective management information system for your organization a multi unitand multi product organization

Finding and reducing waste in service processes : Finding and reducing waste in service processes may be more difficult than in manufacturing operations, but it is definitely possible and potentially very rewarding. Lean thinking has been applied to the legal profession, healthcare services, acc..

Health disparities in morbidity : HCS316- Cultural Diversity in Health & Illness Describe the practices and how they are believed to promote, improve, and/or restore health. Determine how these practices can co-exist with Western medicine practices. Provide examples to illustrate y..

What are the inclusion and exclusion criteria of sample : The aim of this assessment item is to enable students to explore, in detail, the research process by critically analysing a journal article

Select two individuals from different generations : Prior to engaging in this discussion, read "The Experience of Disease: Psychosocial Aspects of Movement Disorder" (Jacopini, 2000), "Caregiver Bodywork: Family Members Experiences of Caring for a Person With Motor Neuron Disease" (Ray & Street, 20..

Create a positive negative externality : Indicate which of the following activities create a positive externality, a negative externality, or no xternality at all: a. During a live-theatre performance, an audience member's cellphone rings loudly. b. You are given a flu shot. c. You purchase..

Project functional in terms of equipment : What is needed to make this project functional in terms of equipment, computers, cash registers, and so forth? What functionality must it have?

Identify one cultural-related health or healing tradition : HCS 316 Cultural Diversity in Health - Health and Illness in the American Indian and Alaska Native population and Identify at least two contributing factors to the health of this population - Identify one cultural-related health or healing tradition ..

Reviews

len1443923

3/29/2017 6:01:50 AM

Provides a detailed rationale for the sample size in relation to the research design. Identifies data collection method and provides a detailed description of how data collected. Provides a detailed rationale for the appropriateness of the data collection method in relation to the study question supported by the literature. Provides an accurate, detailed definition of the concept of rigor, using ideas from more than one source. Identifies all measures taken/ not taken to ensure rigor. The method of data analysis was identified. Provides a detailed description of the data analysis method. Provides a detailed rationale for the chosen data analysis method in relation to the research design. Provides a detailed description of all the study findings. Provides a detailed rationale for the study findings being/not being used in other settings. Sentences free of errors in vocabulary, spelling, grammar, punctuation, and style. Meaning consistently communicated through a complex range of language.

len1443923

3/29/2017 6:01:41 AM

Word count: There is a word limit of 1500 words. Use your computer to total the number of words used in your assignment. However, do not include the reference list at the end of your assignment in the word count. Described the health issue and a number of detailed consequences. Described the contribution to existing literature beyond the significance described in the paper. Described the health issue and a number of detailed consequences. Described the contribution to existing literature beyond the significance described in the paper. Description of all inclusion and exclusion criteria. Explains how identifying inclusion and exclusion criteria prior to recruitment, is important to answering the research question as part of the research design. Identified and described the sampling technique with illustrative detail. Provides a detailed rationale for the judgement of whether the sampling technique was appropriate to the research design. Provided detailed description of how sample size was determined.

len1443923

3/29/2017 6:01:34 AM

Total 1500 words, Australian Student, IMP assignment. This assignment weighted 50% of total mark. There are some question to be answer in basis of specific article, carefully read the articles and answer the question with following the marking criteria. Please all the reference should be not more than five years old. Please provide at least 10-15 references. Please carefully review the marking criteria and standards. They are designed to give guidance regarding the level of understanding of research concepts needed to explicitly identify, discuss and critique to achieve the marks allocated.

Write a Review

Required(*) Message

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

User Account

All Pages