Reference no: EM131702568
Question: David Rodriguez, a citizen of Mexico, entered the United States without inspection at El Paso, Texas, on or about July 22, 1996. During his time in the United States, he lived in Minnesota and fraudulently obtained a Texas birth certificate, a Minnesota driver's license and a social security card in the name of Oscar Martinez, and a social security card and legal resident card in the name of David Rodriguez Silva. He sought to obtain employment with a private employer by checking a box on a Form I-9 indicating that he was a "citizen or national of the United States" and by submitting the fraudulent Martinez driver's license and social security card as support for his claim. On April 19, 2001, Rodriguez married Veronica Vazquez, a United States citizen. On April 24, 2001, he submitted an immediate relative immigrant visa petition, which the Immigration and Naturalization Service (now the USCIS) approved.
The INS informed Rodriguez that he would be considered for lawful permanent residence status subject to his application for adjustment of status. On February 26, 2002, Rodriguez and his wife appeared for an interview with a district adjudications officer as part of the process to adjust his status. Rodriguez brought the fraudulent documents. After the interview, the adjudications officer prepared a sworn statement that included the questions and answers from the interview. Rodriguez reviewed and signed the statement. In the interview and in his resulting sworn statement, Rodriguez admitted that he knew that with the use of the fraudulent documents he had made a claim to a government agency that he was a citizen of the United States. The INS denied Rodriguez's application for adjustment of status because he had made a false claim that he was a United States citizen. On appeal of the agency's decision, the court can either affirm the decision-in which case Rodriguez will be deported back to Mexico-or overlook his earlier employment history and order his change of status based upon his marriage to an American citizen. What are the ethical considerations favoring each of these outcomes? What would you do, if you were the judge and had discretion to rule either way? See Rodriguez v. Mukasey, 519 F.3d 773 (8th Cir. 2008).
What was the number of equivalent units of production
: Using the first-in, first-out method of inventory costing, what was the number of equivalent units of production for conversion costs for the period
|
Describe the effect of higher levels of medical spending
: Describe the effect of higher levels of medical spending, profitability, and fiscal margins on process quality for health care organizations.
|
Target of a network or system intrusion
: Has your company (or school) been the target of a network or system intrusion? What information was targeted?
|
Prepare journal entries necessary to record the transactions
: Described below are certain transactions of Lamar Company for 2018: Prepare journal entries necessary to record the transactions above using appropriate dates
|
What are the ethical considerations favoring each outcomes
: What are the ethical considerations favoring each of these outcomes? What would you do, if you were the judge and had discretion to rule either way?
|
Agreement and the mechanisms for creating value in a sa
: Consider Aegis's overall approach, the particulars of each agreement and the mechanisms for creating value in a SA.
|
Identify the constitutional amendment
: Discuss if Officer Jones' actions were justified under the doctrines of plain view, abandonment, open fields, or border searches.
|
Discuss the various methods to control employer health care
: The rising cost of health care is the topic of many conversations about employer benefits these days. Of the various methods to control employer health care
|
Describe a detailed viable solution that support your thesis
: Describe a detailed, viable solution that supports your thesis. This should be one or two paragraphs. Explain, and support the first advantage to your solution.
|