Reference no: EM132346984 , Length: word count:3000

Wells Fargo Scandal Analysis

You need to write a case study on Wells Fargo Scandal Analysis with words length of 3000.

Requirement of case study: The case study deals with a particular aspect of financial crime/cyber security.

Describe the trend/s and issues (an increase/decrease, legislative reform, a change in character, sequence of activities, and a problem) of your case study and analyse the repercussions of that financial crime/cyber security on business and the community.

The case study topic is your choice. You can choose a financial crime/ cyber security case study discussed in the unit or you can pick a financial crime/ cyber security topic that holds great interest for you. Word limit: 3,000 words.

The structure of the finished Case Study is:

1. Short introduction

2. Case Description (In final form, should be no more than 1000 words) 2019 Session 1 ACCG877- Emerging Issues in Financial Crime Assessment Guide Page 7

3. Case Analysis (In final form, should be around 1500 words)

4. Short conclusion summarising the main points you've made in your 'Analysis'

5. List of literature you've cited. This assignment is to be a concise word processed document and English expression is very important in this task.

This statement is not included in the final word count. Ensure that the Case Study document is uploaded and submitted correctly by clicking the 'submit' button.

Assessment Criteria Three criteria will be used to assess student work in this Unit:

• Knowledge Development: Understanding of key ideas, knowledge components and their interrelationships.

• Application: Ability to apply theoretical ideas and frameworks to educational practice in a critically reflective way.

• Presentation: The extent to which the work has been written and presented in a manner consistent with accepted academic standards.

Performance in relation to each of these criteria will be assessed against the standards below.

Knowledge Development (K) Level Standard

11 - 12 An insightful, comprehensive treatment of all task requirements, demonstrating advanced understanding of the complexities of knowledge in the applied context and of the inter-relationships between knowledge components.

9 - 10 A comprehensive treatment of all task requirements, demonstrating sound understanding of the complexities of knowledge in the applied context and good understanding of the inter-relationships between knowledge components.

7 - 8 All task requirements are satisfactorily addressed, with most treated comprehensively. There is a good understanding of most discrete knowledge components, but not a comprehensive understanding of the interrelationships 2019 Session 1 ACCG877- Emerging Issues in Financial Crime Assessment Guide Page 8 between these components.

6 Many task requirements are addressed to a modest standard but not comprehensively, with limited recognition of relationships between components.

1 - 5 The work does not demonstrate a satisfactory grasp of the knowledge covered in the Unit.

Application (A)

11 - 12 Excellent capacity to critically reflect on, analyse and/or solve problems, to compare situations, explain and interpret behaviour using a variety of conceptual tools and apply knowledge in new contexts.

9 - 10 Good capacity to critically reflect on, analyse and/or solve problems, to compare situations, and to explain and interpret behaviour using a variety of conceptual tools.

7 - 8 Generally demonstrates a sound capacity to reflect on, analyse and/or solve problems, using knowledge to identify, classify and interpret in a meaningful way.

6 Much of the work demonstrates at least some capacity to use knowledge to critically reflect on, analyse and/or solve problems.

1 - 5 The work does not contain sufficient evidence of applying knowledge effectively to critically reflect on, analyse and/or solve problems.

Presentation (P)

11 - 12 Written and presented to an exemplary academic standard.

9 - 10 Written and presented to a high academic standard.

7 - 8 Generally written and presented in a very satisfactory manner-most of the writing is clear, grammatically correct and accurate in terms of spelling, suitably referenced and presented. Literature generally used very appropriately.

6 The writing, presentation and use of the literature have a few flaws but a reasonable proportion of the structure, grammar and referencing is adequate, with sufficient coherence and clarity for the reader to understand most of the ideas and arguments.

Details of how the University defines serious and unavoidable Special Consideration, and information about the processes involved, are contained in the Special Consideration Policy