Reference no: EM133569784
We have now studied several ethical theories. We have learned about Utilitarianism, Kant's Duty Ethics (also known as "Respect for Persons"), Natural Law & Moral Theology, Ross's Principlism, Rawls theory of justice, Aristotle's Virtue Ethics, and Baire's Care Ethics. For this week's discussion, I'd like you to think back on these and share your thoughts on the following:
1. Was there one particular ethical theory that resonates most with you? Explain that one theory and provide examples of how it aligns with the way you make tend to make ethical decisions.
2. Are you an ethical pluralist and, if so, how do you navigate this? That is, does more than one ethical theory from our studies resonate with you? Is one of them primary (most important) in your view or does it depend entirely on the situation? If you're facing an ethical dilemma (say, whether to tell a white lie when it would really make someone feel better), how do you decide which ethical consideration should have the final say in guiding you? If you are not an ethical pluralist, explain how your one theory can answer dilemmas even when there are opposing considerations.
3. Is there any ethical theory that you would like to consider more than you currently do? For example, maybe I tend to be very good at following "rules" (easily do my duties, as Kant would say) though I think it would be good to become more "caring" in my responses to others at difficult times (working on Care Ethics in my life). We have learned, already, how these ethical theories each have strengths and challenges. As with any skill, we can always improve our ethical reasoning. What are some areas that you might like to expand on in your way of approaching moral dilemmas?