Reference no: EM13589076

Dan Dandy Auto Sales uses all types of media to advertise its products. At the end of 2011, the company president, Dan Davenport, decided that all advertising costs would be incurred by corporate headquarters and allocated to each of the company's four sales locations based on number of vehicles sold. Dan was confident that his corporate purchasing manager could negotiate better advertising contracts on a corporate-wide basis than each of the sales managers could on their own. Davenpot budgeted total advertising cost for 2012 to be $1.5 million. He introduced the new plan to his sales managers just before the New Year. The manager of the east sales location, Mike Samson, was not happy. He complained that the new allocation method was unfair and would increase his advertising costs significantly over the prior year. The east location sold high volumes of low-priced used cars and most of the corporate advertising budget was related to new car sales. Following Mike's complaint, Dan decided to take another hard look at what each of the divisions were paying for advertising before the new allocation plan. The results were as follows:

Sales Location: Actual # of Cars Sold in 2011 Actual Advertising Cost incurred in 2011

• East 3,000 235,400
• West 1,100 470,800
• North 1,900 663,400
• South 4,000 770,400

Requirements:

1 Using 2011 data as the cost bases, show the amount of the 2012 advertising cost ($1,500,000) that would be allocated to each of the divisions under the following criteria:

a Davenport's allocation method based on number of cars sold

b the stand-alone method (using advertising costs)

c the incremental-allocation method, with divisions ranked on the basis of dollars spet on advertising in 2011

2 which method do you think is most equitable to the divisional sales managers? what other options might President Dan Davenport have for allocating the advertising costs?