Points: 150
|
Assignment 3: The Pharmaceutical Industry and Health Professional Services
|
Criteria
|
Unacceptable
Below 70% F
|
Fair
70-79% C
|
Proficient
80-89% B
|
Exemplary
90-100% A
|
1. Recommend a strategy for communication with Get Well Drugs in order to determine if the drugs supplied by this manufacturer are within benchmark standards set forth by the FDA.
Weight: 20%
|
Did not submit or incompletely recommended a strategy for communication with Get Well Drugs in order to determine if the drugs supplied by this manufacturer are within benchmark standards set forth by the FDA.
|
Partially recommended a strategy for communication with Get Well Drugs in order to determine if the drugs supplied by this manufacturer are within benchmark standards set forth by the FDA.
|
Satisfactorily recommended a strategy for communication with Get Well Drugs in order to determine if the drugs supplied by this manufacturer are within benchmark standards set forth by the FDA.
|
Thoroughly recommended a strategy for communication with Get Well Drugs in order to determine if the drugs supplied by this manufacturer are within benchmark standards set forth by the FDA.
|
2. Outline a plan for asking questions directed toward Get Well Drugs about any FDA regulations which may be applicable to your local hospital.
Weight: 20%
|
Did not submit or incompletely outlined a plan for asking questions directed toward Get Well Drugs about any FDA regulations which may be applicable to your local hospital.
|
Partially outlined a plan for asking questions directed toward Get Well Drugs about any FDA regulations which may be applicable to your local hospital.
|
Satisfactorily outlined a plan for asking questions directed toward Get Well Drugs about any FDA regulations which may be applicable to your local hospital.
|
Thoroughly outlined a plan for asking questions directed toward Get Well Drugs about any FDA regulations which may be applicable to your local hospital.
|
3. Outline a plan for communicating these findings to a local consortium of nurses and physicians at your hospital. This plan must include, at a minimum, the cost of the drugs, as well as the types of drugs for use in mental, behavioral, and general services.
Weight: 20%
|
Did not submit or incompletely outlined a plan for communicating these findings to a local consortium of nurses and physicians at your hospital. Did not submit or incompletely included, at a minimum, the cost of the drugs, as well as the types of drugs for use in mental, behavioral, and general services.
|
Partially outlined a plan for communicating these findings to a local consortium of nurses and physicians at your hospital. Partially included, at a minimum, the cost of the drugs, as well as the types of drugs for use in mental, behavioral, and general services.
|
Satisfactorily outlined a plan for communicating these findings to a local consortium of nurses and physicians at your hospital. Satisfactorily included, at a minimum, the cost of the drugs, as well as the types of drugs for use in mental, behavioral, and general services.
|
Thoroughly outlined a plan for communicating these findings to a local consortium of nurses and physicians at your hospital. Thoroughly included, at a minimum, the cost of the drugs, as well as the types of drugs for use in mental, behavioral, and general services.
|
4. Conclude your findings, in which you suggest the pros and cons of using Get Well Drugs.
Weight: 15%
|
Did not submit or incompletely concluded your findings, in which you suggested the pros and cons of using Get Well Drugs.
|
Partially concluded your findings, in which you suggested the pros and cons of using Get Well Drugs.
|
Satisfactorily concluded your findings, in which you suggested the pros and cons of using Get Well Drugs.
|
Thoroughly concluded your findings, in which you suggested the pros and cons of using Get Well Drugs.
|
5. 4 references (or number in the assignment)
Weight: 5%
|
No references provided
|
Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.
|
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.
|
Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
|
6. Writing Mechanics, Grammar, and Formatting
Weight: 5%
|
Serious and persistent errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.
|
Partially free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.
|
Mostly free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.
|
Error free or almost error free grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.
|
7. Appropriate use of APA in-text citations and reference section
Weight: 5%
|
Lack of in-text citations and / or lack of reference section.
|
In-text citations and references are provided, but they are only partially formatted correctly in APA style.
|
Most in-text citations and references are provided, and they are generally formatted correctly in APA style.
|
In-text citations and references are error free or almost error free and consistently formatted correctly in APA style.
|
8. Information Literacy / Integration of Sources
Weight: 5%
|
Serious errors in the integration of sources, such as intentional or accidental plagiarism, or failure to use in-text citations.
|
Sources are partially integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.
|
Sources are mostly integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.
|
Sources are consistently integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.
|
9. Clarity and Coherence of Writing
Weight: 5%
|
Information is confusing to the reader and fails to include reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.
|
Information is partially clear with minimal reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.
|
Information is mostly clear and generally supported with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.
|
Information is provided in a clear, coherent, and consistent manner with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.
|