Reference no: EM132172294
Assume It is the year 2020, and drones are everywhere. Amazon’s octocopters finally deliver packages in most major cities within 30 minutes without knocking down pedestrians; and college students everywhere welcome late-night nachos from Taco Bell Tacocopters.
Indoor drones are still in the pioneering phase—backyard enthusiasts are building tiny versions, but no large-scale commercial efforts have been put toward indoor utility drones. That’s all about to change. You work for a multinational technology corporation on a sprawling, 25-acre headquarters campus, with offices in 2 million square feet of interior space in one large building and four additional smaller (but still large) buildings. The official Head of Interior Spaces is your boss; you’re the leader of the Consideration of New Things team.
In a meeting with your team, your boss says, “I’ve just heard from my friend at Right To Drones Too (R2D2) that his group has perfected their inside drone. It’s small and light but can carry up to 10 pounds. It includes a camera, a speaker, and a recorder.” Your team expresses surprise; no one even knew an inside utility drone was under development, and governments worldwide are still haggling over regulations for drones. Your boss goes on enthusiastically, “I’ve seen the little drones, and I think you’ll be impressed—not only can they scoot across the quad, but they can fetch things off tables, grab me a latté, attend meetings for me, check over your shoulders to see what you’re working on … anything! They’re really accurate, agile, and super quiet, so you’ll barely even know they’re around.
My friend wants us to have the first 100 drones here for free, and he’s willing to send them over tomorrow! I figure we can hand them out randomly, although of course we’ll each have one.” You glance at your team members and are relieved to see doubt and hesitation on their faces. “Sounds, uh, great,” you reply. “But how about the team takes the afternoon to set the ground rules?”
How might the drones influence employee behavior?
Is it more or less likely that the use of the drones will cause employees to act ethically? Why?
Based on motivations and organizational structure considerations, which positions should get the drones initially? How can you justify your decision ethically?
What restrictions for use should these people be given, and what is the likely reaction of employees, both those who get drones and those who don’t, will react to this change?
How should the organization deal with sabotage or misuse of the drones? The value of a drone is $2,500.
Many organizations already use electronic monitoring of employees, including sifting through website usage, social media posts and e-mail correspondence as a condition of employment. Is it more or less likely employees would respond favorably to the drone surveillance than electronic monitoring of web or e-mail activity and WHY.