Can I request one thing Is it possible to pay both assessment together Because for seperate assessment i need to pay more transaction fees So i need to put only 1 ticket id or both into the payment Please check i have done payment for both assessment But only 1 assessment is in process Can you please check Can you please confirm with the expert as this is continuous assessment with before assessment So please check all requirements and continue assessment which i have mentioned ticket id. Also i need projectlibre file to show my coordinator. But please make sure it’s continuous assessment Thanks for providing the perfect work, its all good, and thanks for clearing my doubt regarding plagiarism, I was thinking the references are also counted in the plagiarism. great help

Format of answer consistent with question requirements and KBS guidelines. Word count is within + / - 10% of requirement. Does not comply with KBS guidelines. Major layout errors. Breaches word limit restrictions. Mostly compliant with KBS guidelines. Basic formatting with some layout errors. Compliant with word limit restrictions. Complies with KBS guidelines. Format generally sound. Compliant with word limit restrictions. Exceeds basic compliance with KBS guidelines. Format portrays information well. Compliant with word limit restrictions. Exceeds basic compliance with KBS guidelines. Format presents information clearly and concisely. Compliant with word limit restrictions.

Correct academic writing style used, including correct spelling, grammar and punctuation. Writing style is unclear; lacks logical flow and structure; numerous spelling grammatical errors. Writing style lacks some clarity; some flaws in logical flow and structure; some use of discipline specific academic language. Several spelling or grammatical errors. Writing style is mostly clear; Mostly written in discipline specific academic language; Some spelling or grammatical errors. Writing style is clear; Correct use of discipline specific academic language. Some minor spelling or grammatical errors. Writing style is clear; Fluent use of discipline specific academic language. No spelling or grammatical errors.

Report clearly and logically written. Appropriate theory and research used to answer question posed. Lacks logical flow and structure; Argument supported by theory sourced from non-academic literature. No discussion of academic research. Cites very few sources. Some errors in logical flow and structure; Argument supported by basic discussion of relevant theory sourced from a minimal number of academic sources. Little if any discussion of relevant research. Generally sound logical flow and structure; Argument supported by broad discussion of relevant theory sourced from academic literature. Relevant research acknowledged but not discussed. Cites several academic sources. Very good logical flow and structure; Argument supported by detailed discussion of relevant theory and research sourced from numerous academic sources. Excellent logical flow and structure; Argument supported by comprehensive discussion of relevant theory and research sourced from numerous quality academic sources.

Appendices (updated Milestone Plan, task list (WBS) and Gantt chart) Few updates have been made, demonstrating insufficient thinking. Updates fit with the brief and demonstrate a basic level of thinking. Updates fit with the brief and have been well considered demonstrating a solid level of thinking. Updates show depth of thinking and demonstrate considered thinking. Updates are comprehensive and demonstrate depth of thinking. Personal reflection on the process The reflection does not move beyond a description of the learning experience. The reflection attempts to analyse the learning experience, but the value of the learning to the student or others is vague and/or unclear. The reflection analyses many of the learning episodes and makes several connections to how the learning can be applied to self or others. The reflection is an analysis of the learning experience and the value of the derived learning to self or others. The reflection is an in-depth analysis of the learning experience, the value of the derived learning to self or others, and the enhancement of the student’s appreciation for the discipline.

as you see the attached file it is continues assignment means it is connected with before assignment2. so please prefer the assignent2 and update that assignment as per the requirements and make it new report. also in this assignment i need project libre file Assessment Marking Rubric Criteria F (Fail) 0%-49% P (Pass) 50%-64% CR (Credit) 65%-74% D (Distinction) 75% - 84% HD (High Distinction) 85%-100% Progress Report (status. implications, adjustments) The progress report lacks thoughtful consideration. The assumptions demonstrate insufficient thinking. The progress report is basic and requires more consideration. The assumptions demonstrate a basic level of thinking. The progress report has been well considered. The assumptions demonstrate a solid level of thinking. The progress report shows thoughtful consideration. The assumptions demonstrate considered thinking. The progress report shows comprehensive and thoughtful consideration. The assumptions demonstrate depth of thinking.