Reference no: EM133297692
Jacob died unexpectedly in an auto accident. He is survived by two adult daughters, Amber and Sue. He left a valid Will which stated that his estate shall be split equally between his two daughters. His assets when he died were:
a. House owned in his sole name;
b. Life insurance policy with his daughters named as equal beneficiaries.
c. Lake house, worth $150,000, owned jointly, with rights of survivorship, with his daughter Amber.
d. Bank account in his sole name
e. Retirement benefits, worth $400,000, with his daughter Sue named as beneficiary.
Regarding how Jacob's estate will pass and to whom:
1. Which of Jacob's assets will be controlled by his Will and go through the probate process. Explain your answer.
2. Which assets will not be subject to his Will and will not go through probate? How and to whom will the asset pass? Explain your answer.
3. After all Jacob's assets are transferred, have Amber and Sue received equal shares of all his assets? Why or why not?
Is provocation available as defence for bruno
: What is the nature of the tort or torts which have just occurred in this mall's parking lot? Is provocation available as a defence for Bruno?
|
About puffery in business law
: What happens when a statement becomes an illegal statement, and what does the law say about it? We are talking about Puffery in Business Law.
|
Person on second probationary period
: Explain why an employer may not place a person on a second probationary period during the first renewal of a fixed term contract in Antigua and Barbuda,
|
Guest information should be handled
: Discuss the information that should be included in a guest register and how requests by police and others for guest information should be handled.
|
Unexpectedly in auto accident
: Jacob died unexpectedly in an auto accident. Which of Jacob's assets will be controlled by his Will and go through the probate process.
|
Explaining the law correctly
: Create a maximum five minute video on ANY topic. Explaining the law correctly. The quality of your presentation. An interesting case.
|
Bpya holdings v. innovators insurance
: Explain the similarities between the case of BPYA Holdings v. Innovators Insurance, Westpac Banking Corporation v. National Australia Bank
|
Evidence to support why the politicians
: Evidence to support why the politicians like the President, Vice President, Senate and House of Representatives should be required to publicly
|
Clean Water Act
: Why does the Clean Water Act treat agricultural storm water runoff differently from other types of stormwater runoff?
|