Understanding of the epistemology bases for research

Assignment Help Management Theories
Reference no: EM131897104 , Length: word count:3500

Management Research Methods

Need two MRM reports with two different topics.

Learning outcomes

You will be able to develop a deep understanding of the epistemology and ontology bases for research, as well as research methodology in the field of management. You will appreciate the different phases of research, and the nature and characteristics of each of them.

Your coursework assignment is designed for you to demonstrate your knowledge of management research methods and to prepare you for writing your research proposal to meet the requirements of the dissertation module. You are required to write a report of 3,500 words on a topic of your choice as explained below.

Step 1: Select a topic of interest or business problem relevant to your degree specialism or pathway, i.e. if you are on the generic International Management degree, your topic will have an International Management theme. If you are taking a pathway within that degree, you will focus on a topic related to the pathway (marketing, finance, or HRM). The MBA would focus on topics relevant to strategic or operations management within an international business context.Choose one of these topicsthat motivates you and that you are likely to pursue for your dissertation (you may change your mind later, but it will be to your advantage if you stick to it, so choose carefully). This will require some preliminary research into that specific area.

Step 2: For your chosen topic identify the body or bodies of knowledge that you consider relevant and find at least four or five academic journals that publish literature in this field. You should use key words or terms to search for the most relevant articles in these journals on your topic and identify the key authors by comparing the cited references across these papers. You should start to build up a bibliography of relevant literature, which you will analyse to ascertain the research questions or problems addressed, theories drawn upon or developed and the range of research methods used.

Step 3: Present your analysis within a report containing 6 elements as detailed below:

1) An introduction that provides a brief commentary of key relevant literature. Be sure to justify your choice of these references in introducing the existing knowledge on your topic. (About 250 words)

2) A further section discussing particular conversations taking place in the relevant journals you have selected with a map of the literature using a visual presentation in the form of either a mind map, Venn diagram, or grandfather, father, son literature map. The map should show the relationship between key knowledge contributions (seminar 3 will cover suggested formats for your map). (About 750 words)

3) An analysis section which documents the research questions, theories, and methods used in the literature, including at least one table to show the extent of use of alternative research methods (seminar 3 and 4 will cover suggested formats for this table). (About 500 words)

4) A detailed critique of at least two well-used research methodologies in the literature you have reviewed. Discuss a) how they are applied; b) how the methods were deployed to provide a worthwhile contribution to theory and research and c) what gaps the methods may leave that could lend the area to further analysis (and an opportunity for your own research). (About 1500 words)

5) A conclusion with regard to those research question(s) you consider worthy of further investigation in the light of your analysis above, and a suitable research methodology for your own proposed investigation and potential research question/s. (About 500 words)

6) A bibliography containing a minimum of 12 references to relevant journal articles from good academic sources, including at least 6 published in the last 24 months and all cited in your analysis (seminar 4 will cover how to find quality articles and reference correctly).

Your report should be presented in good academic style, having been formatted using the Harvard referencing system and proof-read for grammatical errors. It should not exceed 3,500 words including tables and figures, but excluding references.

The final report should be submitted via Moodle to a turn-it-in box and will be graded according to the following marking criteria:

- Introduction to the topic and description of the relevant literature using appropriate mapping methods (items 1 and 2)
- For the literature analysis, breadth and depth of explored research with a clear focus emerging (item 3)
- Comprehensive critique of two specific research methods (item 4)
- Balanced conclusions following on from earlier analyses (item 5)
- Quality of sources and correct presentation (item 6)

You MUST use the Harvard System.

Reference no: EM131897104

Questions Cloud

Why we need to configure ntp in internetworks : Why we need to configure NTP in Internetworks? List few common problems from your experience or from reading materials with solutions
How realistic is alternative power source for your community : What organisms would benefit most from this conversion? How realistic is this alternative power source for your community?
Customer-oriented pricing exercise : Russ Winer New York University Medi-Cult, a biotech company based in Denmark, has developed a new alternative to In Vitro Fertilization
Analyze the complexities of the derivative markets : Analyze the complexities of the derivative markets and how the reporting of derivatives may be deceiving to investors..
Understanding of the epistemology bases for research : EUB020L007A - Management Research Methods - develop a deep understanding of the epistemology and ontology bases for research, as well as research methodology
Identical in every way except their capital structures : Levered, Inc., and Unlevered, Inc., are identical in every way except their capital structures. What is the value of each firm?
Describe your final carbon footprint : Describe your final carbon footprint. Examine how you impact the environment. Do you think you impact the environment more than you should?
Instruments pays periodic interest during the life of loan : Which of these debt instruments pays periodic interest during the life of the loan, but none of the principal is repaid until maturity?
Local sources of population health data for planning : Why should health care managers use available federal, state, and local sources of population health data for planning?

Reviews

len1897104

3/12/2018 1:06:52 AM

Hello, we need 2 MRM reports with 2 different topics. We have 5 articles each for the topics. I have attached the assessment guidelines regarding the report. If you are willing to do the report we will send you the respected articles of the topics. We need it by 15th.

len1897104

3/12/2018 1:05:53 AM

Quality of sources & presentation (15%) Outstanding and flawless. Clear, concise, and effectively argued within the length allowed; skilled use of academic conventions; accurate proof-reading. Very good control of length; skilled use of academic conventions; nearly all errors eliminated in proof-reading. Competent control of length; good use of academic conventions; accurate spelling, grammar, etc.; careful proof-reading. Length requirements observed; appropriate use of academic conventions; minor errors in spelling, grammar etc.; quite careful proof-reading. Presentation is either too long or too short in relation to content; errors in application of academic conventions; some errors in spelling, grammar etc.; little indication of proof-reading. Very poorly presented work; presentation is either too short or too long (waffling); missing key elements or parts; major errors in spelling, grammar etc.; no indication of proof-reading. Missing. Wholly incorrect or not attempted.

len1897104

3/12/2018 1:05:47 AM

Conclusions (10%) Outstanding and flawless. Insightful evaluation and critical discussion of implications for own dissertation. Perceptive appraisal of implications for own dissertation. Good appraisal of implications for own dissertation. Satisfactory appraisal of implications for own dissertation. Limited appraisal of implications for own dissertation. Very limited appraisal of implications for own dissertation. Missing. Wholly incorrect or not attempted.

len1897104

3/12/2018 1:05:34 AM

Critique of two specific research methods (40%) Outstanding and flawless. Appropriate research method selected and very well-explained; full awareness of constraints and limitations deriving from investigation. Appropriate research method selected and well-explained; very good awareness of constraints and limitations deriving from investigation. Appropriate research method selected and presented and clearly explained; general awareness of constraints and limitations deriving from investigation. Generally appropriate research method selected; some awareness of constraints and limitations deriving from investigation. Selection of research method not well explained or not fully appropriate; limited awareness of constraints and limitations deriving from investigation. Selection of research method not explained or not appropriate; very limited awareness of constraints and limitations deriving from investigation. Missing. Wholly incorrect or not attempted.

len1897104

3/12/2018 1:05:28 AM

Literature analysis (20%) Outstanding and flawless. Comprehensive, systematic, and critical analysis; authoritative sources included; all citations and references in Harvard format. Critical review and synthesis of ideas; material mostly selected from authoritative sources; almost all citations and references in Harvard format. Good analysis of the literature, quite critical and well-developed; material selected mainly from authoritative sources; most citations and references in Harvard format. Ideas organised into a coherent argument; some critical analysis of ideas; material selected from a mix of sources, including non-authoritative ones; some errors in citations and references. Relatively poor organisation and analysis of ideas; material selected mainly from non-authoritative sources; significant errors in citations and references. Very poor organisation and analysis of ideas; limited sources selected; major errors in citations and references. Missing. Wholly incorrect or not attempted.

len1897104

3/12/2018 1:05:00 AM

Outstanding 100 Excellent (80-89) 85 Very Good (70-79) 75 Good (60-69) 65 Adequate (50-59) 55 Marginal Fail (40-49) 45 Fail (30-39) 35 Not done 0 Introduction to topic & relevant literature map(15%) Outstanding and flawless. Topic introduced in an articulated and well-supported fashion; extensive use of appropriate examples or references; clear and comprehensive literature map. Very good effort at introducing the topic; insightful examples and very good references provided to support arguments; literature map is mostly clear and comprehensive. Good effort at introducing the topic; good examples or references provided to support arguments; literature map lacking minor parts or contributions. Generally adequate effort at introducing the topic; some examples or references provided to support arguments; literature map lacking some parts or contributions. Some effort at introducing the topic; few examples or references provided to support arguments; literature map lacking major parts. Weak effort at introducing the topic; very few examples or references provided; literature map not appropriately developed. Missing. Wholly incorrect or not attempted.

len1897104

3/12/2018 1:04:50 AM

• Step Three – A moderation meeting takes place where all members of the teaching and marking team will review the marking of others to confirm whether they agree with the mark and feedback. • Step Four – Work at Levels 5 and 6 then goes to an external examiner who will review a sample of work to confirm that the marking between different staff is consistent and fair. • Step Five – Your mark and feedback is processed by the Office and made available to you.

len1897104

3/12/2018 1:04:45 AM

Marking and feedback process Between you handing in your work and then receiving your feedback and marks within 20 days, there are a number of quality assurance processes that we go through to ensure that students receive marks which reflects their work. A brief summary is provided below. • Step One – The module and marking team meet to agree standards, expectations and how feedback will be provided. • Step Two – A subject expert will mark your work using the criteria provided in the assessment brief.

Write a Review

Management Theories Questions & Answers

  Worksheet uses a weighted-point evaluation system

The following worksheet uses a weighted-point evaluation system to calculate weighted performance scores along four dimensions for up to four potential sources. Re-create this spreadsheet in Microsoft Excel. Code your spreadsheet so that any chan..

  The cheesecake factory overall market potential

What are your views regarding The Cheesecake Factory's overall market potential?

  Description of two environmental forces

The steps to externally evaluate the firm. Description of two environmental forces that may have some impact - positive or negative - on the organization or business

  Explain the quantitative and qualitative tools

For this assignment select either your own organization or an organization about which you know enough to review the supply chain processes.

  What is a horizontal merger

Primary Task Response: Within the Discussion Board area, write 500-700 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments.

  Efforts to improve access to health care in rural areas

As part of its ongoing efforts to improve access to health care in rural areas, General Medical Center is subsidizing the start-up and first year of operations of a new pediatric medicine practice, Kids R Kids Family Medicine. The business will be ow..

  Argue that tactics used by followers to get noticed

What do you say to those who argue that tactics used by followers to get noticed by their leader (such as impressions management, ingratiation, and selfpromotion) are shameful and self-serving and should be avoided?

  Briefly explain the difference between a competitive bid

Briefly explain the difference between a competitive bid underwriting and a negotiated underwriting.

  Determine the reinstatement of the concession

The Big Co. is incorporated and headquartered in Country K, but the majority of shares are owned by shareholders who are nationals of Country M.

  Determine how you are going to approach mrs clark

Determine how you are going to approach Mrs. Clark. Outline your plan, and provide rationale for your choices. What flexibility have you built into your plan?

  Discuss the controversial nature

In today's economy, there are a wide number of powerful companies who from all appearances control massive segments of different markets.

  Lost vacation days

Gulf Port Ships, Inc. is a large shipbuilding company located in the Gulf Coast. One afternoon the firm made the decision to shut down operations due to an approaching hurricane and forecasted arrival of tropical storm force winds to the local area a..

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd